司法权介入公司治理问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-15 12:16

本文关键词：司法权介入公司治理问题研究　出处：《辽宁大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：公司治理是经济学和法学共同关心的问题,现代公司法理论关于公司治理的核心内容是“股东自治”或“公司自治”,股东作为公司的所有人,在公司治理中具有极为重要的地位,保护股东权利和维护公司自治是公司法的基本任务之一。公司治理的着眼点是在所有权和经营权分离的条件下,对各利益主体之间的利益关系和责任分担进行以法律约束为主要内容的制度安排。其根本目的是实现公司治理活动公平与效率的价值目标。本文试图从司法权介入促进和改善公司治理的视角对股东诉讼以及与公司治理相关的非诉讼机制进行研究,揭示司法权介入公司治理的必要性和有限性,并对我国司法权介入公司治理问题进行评析,最后提出完善建议。全文共三部分: 本文第一部分对司法权介入公司治理的必要性和有限性进行论证。通过对必要性的论证来说明司法权介入公司治理问题的可行性。虽然司法权介入公司治理是必要的,但是由于司法权介入公司治理只是公司外部治理机制的一个组成部分,受其作用机制的制约,其对公司治理的调节功能存在限制。同时,由于司法权力具有国家公权力的性质,因此司法权力对公司治理这一私法领域的介入必须保持在适当的限度内,以防止“公”对“私”的过度干预。本文第二部分包括司法权介入公司治理的法律途径以及存在的问题两个部分,其中,司法权介入公司治理的法律途径主要介绍了我国现行《公司法》中包括的股东直接诉讼、股东派生诉讼以及公司法人人格否认之诉三部分内容,并针对其存在的问题做了系统详尽的论述。本文第三部分是完善我国司法权介入公司治理的建议,包括了司法权介入公司治理的基本原则,并在这些原则的指导下,结合第二部分存在的问题论述的基础上,结合我国的实际国情和立法现状,提出了完善我国司法权介入公司治理机制的具体措施。基于以上分析和论证,本文得出结论:司法权介入公司治理是非常必要的,司法权对公司治理的适度介入有力地促进了公司治理的改善,是维护公司自治的外部保障机制。
[Abstract]:Corporate governance is a common concern of economics and law . The core content of modern company law theory on corporate governance is " shareholder autonomy " or " company autonomy " . The shareholder , as the owner of the company , plays a very important role in corporate governance . This paper attempts to study the shareholder ' s lawsuit and the non - litigation mechanism related to corporate governance from the perspective of judicial power ' s involvement in promoting and improving corporate governance , and reveals the necessity and limitation of judicial power ' s intervention in corporate governance . The full text consists of three parts : The first part of this article discusses the necessity and limitation of judicial power ' s involvement in corporate governance . Though it is necessary to intervene in corporate governance , it is necessary to intervene in corporate governance , but because judicial power is a part of corporate external governance , it is limited by its mechanism of action . At the same time , because of the nature of the state power , judicial power must be kept within the limits of the corporate governance , so as to prevent the excessive intervention of " public " on " private " . The second part of this paper includes two parts : the legal way of judicial power to intervene in corporate governance and the existing problems , in which the legal way of judicial power to intervene in corporate governance mainly introduces the three parts of the direct litigation , shareholder derivative action and the denial of the personality of the public judicial person , and makes a systematic exposition of the existing problems . The third part of this paper is to perfect our country ' s judicial power to intervene in corporate governance , including the basic principle of judicial power to intervene in corporate governance , and , under the guidance of these principles , on the basis of the problems discussed in the second part , this article puts forward some concrete measures to perfect the governance mechanism of China ' s judicial power . Based on the above analysis and demonstration , it is concluded that it is necessary for the judicial power to intervene in corporate governance , and the proper intervention of the judicial power on corporate governance effectively promotes the improvement of corporate governance , and is an external guarantee mechanism for maintaining the autonomy of the company .

【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】