公司瑕疵设立制度理念比较研究——我国公司瑕疵设立制度批判与理论建构

发布时间：2018-06-03 22:40

本文选题：设立瑕疵 + 原则承认主义　；参考：《商业经济与管理》2007年01期

【摘要】：对于存在设立瑕疵的公司,各国大都通过相应补救措施,允许继续保留其法律人格。对此,英美法系采原则承认主义;大陆法系在制度表层,普遍采原则否定主义,但在深层次则包含着尽可能承认的立法精神。在这种差异化的制度安排背后,其实存在着不同法系公司法制度的深层次理念差异。我国《公司法》规定的公司撤销登记制度存在重大缺陷,在登记主管部门及最高人民法院补救性制度安排的基础上,还应基于制度理念的探寻作出新的制度设计。
[Abstract]:For companies with defective establishment, most countries allow them to retain their legal personality through corresponding remedies. In this regard, the common law system adopts the principle recognition doctrine; the continental law system adopts the principle negationism on the surface of the system, but at the deep level it contains the legislative spirit of recognizing as much as possible. Behind this kind of differential institutional arrangement, there are deep-level differences in corporate law systems of different legal systems. There are major defects in the system of company revocation and registration stipulated in the Company Law of our country. On the basis of the remedial system arrangement of the registration department and the Supreme people's Court, a new system design should also be made based on the exploration of the system idea.
【作者单位】：河海大学法学院
【基金】：司法部重点项目课题(04SFB1004)
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】