公司司法解散制度探析

发布时间：2018-06-19 21:11

本文选题：公司法 + 公司僵局　；参考：《复旦大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 保护中小股东权益是现代公司制度的重要使命。赋予股东在特定条件下请求法院判决解散公司几乎是所有市场经济国家公司立法的通例。我国修订后的《公司法》的第183条对公司司法解散制度进行了明确的规定。2008年5月5日最高人民法院通过了《关于适用中华人民共和国公司法若干问题的规定》(二)对公司解散制度做出了解释,解决了由于立法条文过于简单所带来的一些问题,是一部非常及时和针对性很强的司法解释。但综观各国立法比较而言,该公司司法解散制度无论是实体还是程序上都还存在一些缺陷和不足。且在司法实践中,法官如何实现“公司自治”和“司法权力”的平衡,实现公司法运行的效率和公平存在一定的难度,需借鉴西方国家成熟的司法审判经验。本文以公司法第183条为剖析对象,采用历史研究、文献研究的方法探讨公司司法解散制度的理论基础;通过比较研究揭示我国立法的不足与缺陷,反映其现状和存在的问题;同时借鉴国外相关制度运行状况,从法定解散事由、诉讼主体资格、举证责任分配、诉讼防御措施等的构建来完善目前我国的公司司法解散制度。最后指出在司法实践中应注意的几个问题,通过案例研究从司法层面对公司司法解散进行具体的分析,将司法权力控制在合理的程度,实现法官的合理自由裁量权。
[Abstract]:Protecting the rights and interests of minority shareholders is an important mission of modern company system. Under certain conditions, it is a general rule for shareholders to ask the court to dissolve the company in almost all market economy countries. Article 183 of the revised Company Law clearly stipulates the system of judicial dissolution of companies. On May 5, 2008, the Supreme people's Court adopted the provisions on the Application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China ( 2) explaining the system of dissolution of the company, It solves some problems caused by too simple legislative provisions and is a very timely and highly targeted judicial interpretation. However, there are still some defects and deficiencies in the judicial dissolution system of the company both in substance and procedure. In the judicial practice, it is difficult for judges to achieve the balance between "corporate autonomy" and "judicial power" and to realize the efficiency and fairness of the company law, so it is necessary to learn from the mature judicial experience of western countries. This paper takes Article 183 of the Company Law as the object of analysis, discusses the theoretical basis of the system of judicial dissolution of the company by means of historical research and literature research, reveals the shortcomings and defects of our legislation through comparative research, and reflects its present situation and existing problems. At the same time, from the legal dissolution reasons, the subject qualification of litigation, burden of proof distribution, litigation defense measures to improve the current system of judicial dissolution of companies in China. Finally, this paper points out several problems that should be paid attention to in judicial practice. Through the case study, the author analyzes the judicial dissolution of the company from the judicial level, controls the judicial power to a reasonable degree, and realizes the judge's reasonable discretion.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【引证文献】