论南海仲裁案的法律与政治——国际批判法学的视角

发布时间：2018-02-28 14:52

  本文关键词： 南海仲裁案 国际批判法学 国家政治 虚假的国际主义　出处：《西南政法大学学报》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：南海仲裁案深刻地蕴含着法律与政治之间的关系。国际法中的政治主要是指国家政治,即国家根据自身利益和意志而行动。国际法中还存在由超越国家政治的组织来调整国家行为的理想,这种理想属于国际主义。然而在现实中,国际主义往往被国家政治所利用,从而产生了虚假的国际主义。虚假的国际主义是貌似合法但实质上不正当的国家政治。菲律宾、临时仲裁庭和美国、日本都属于虚假的国际主义,分别对应工具的国际主义、错误的国际主义和虚伪的国际主义。国际批判法学揭示了这三者所涉法律背后的政治。
[Abstract]:The South China Sea arbitration case contains a profound relationship between law and politics. Politics in international law mainly refers to national politics. That is, the State acts according to its own interests and will. In international law, there is also the ideal of the organization that transcends the politics of the State to adjust the conduct of the state, which belongs to internationalism. In reality, however, internationalism is often exploited by the politics of the State. Thus, false internationalism. False internationalism is a seemingly legal but substantially illegitimate national politics. The Philippines, the temporary Arbitration Tribunal, the United States and Japan all belong to false internationalism, which corresponds to instrumentalism, respectively. False internationalism and hypocritical internationalism. International critical jurisprudence reveals the politics behind these three laws.
【作者单位】： 北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D993.5
，

本文编号：1547757