论网吧转让合同效力的判定

发布时间：2018-02-22 14:19

本文关键词： 网吧转让合同强制性规定合同效力行政许可　出处：《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文以网吧转让合同效力的判定为研究对象。除引言外，全文共分为七个部分。第一部分简要介绍本文所选取案例的基本情况。本文所选取的两个案例都是涉及《网络文化经营许可证》转让的网吧转让合同纠纷案件。两个案例分别是单体网吧经营一段时间后整体转让和连锁网吧分店转让引发的合同纠纷案件，两个案件的审理法院都认定转让合同违反了《网络文化经营许可证》不得转让的强制性规定，判定转让合同无效。第二部分介绍案件争议。本文案例中的网吧转让合同通过转让作为网吧经营单位的公司后,变更《网络文化经营许可证》登记事项中的经营单位法定代表人这一方式转移对《网络文化经营许可证》的实际控制及许可证上的利益。很多法院以转让合同涉及《网络文化经营许可证》转让为由，判决转让合同因违反《网络文化经营许可证》不得转让的规定而无效。第三部分对法院在判定网吧转让合同效力时的思路进行分析。论文指出法院在判定合同效力的过程中没有按照《最高人民法院关于适用中华人民共和国合同法若干问题的解释（二）》和《最高人民法院关于当前形势下审理民商事合同纠纷案件若干问题的指导意见》的要求进行法律法规意旨的探寻和相互冲突利益的衡量，而是武断地认定网吧转让合同因违反了《网络文化经营许可证》不得转让的强制性规定而无效。法院这种直接认定合同违反了强制性规定而判定合同无效的思维方式，存在说理不足的缺陷。第四部分介绍判定违反强制性规定之合同效力的比较法经验。论文分别对罗马法、德国法、日本法、英美法、我国台湾地区和我国大陆的效力判定理论进行介绍。在比较法经验介绍后的理论小结中指出理论上存在着一元论与二元论，同时基于解释论立场，指明我国立法采取了二元论的立场。第五部分在结合一元论与二元论的基础上，提出笔者拟采用的违反强制性规定合同效力的判定方法。首先，分析了《合同法》第五十二条第五项的概括条款地位。然后，阐述笔者拟采用的判定方法：探寻具体强制性规定的目的，并衡量冲突的公私利益。第六部分结合网吧转让合同的特殊性，，提出网吧转让合同效力的判定方法。第一，探明网络文化经营许可具体规定的目的是控制网吧数量和布局、维护网吧行业经营秩序。第二，提出利益衡量的三个步骤。首先，指出具体规定保护的公共利益有：网吧数量和布局控制、网吧经营管理秩序。其次，提炼出转让合同中可能存在的当事人利益有：网吧经营者的经营利益、许可证成本利益和对许可证变更的信赖利益。最后，提出利益衡量的过程需要考量当事人的转让行为是否具有倒卖许可证的主观恶意。第七部分对网吧转让的情形进行类型化的分析，并对前文案例提出自己的处理意见。论文首先将网吧转让分为了含实体店铺的单体网吧转让、不含实体店铺的单体网吧转让和连锁网吧分店的转让等三种类型，然后就三种类型的网吧转让合同分别提出了处理意见。最后，对本文选取的两个案例分别提出了处理意见。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the validity of the net bar transfer contract is the research object. Apart from the introduction, the full text is divided into seven parts.
The first part briefly introduces the basic situation of the case. The two cases selected in this paper are the internet transfer contract dispute cases involving "network culture operation license > transfer. Two cases were caused by the overall transfer and transfer of single branch chain of Internet cafes Internet cafes operating for a period of time after the contract dispute case, the trial the two cases are identified in violation of the mandatory provisions of the contract for the transfer of" network culture operation license "shall not transfer, determine the transfer contract invalid.
The second part introduces the controversy of the case. In this case the Internet as the internet transfer contract through the transfer of business units of the company, the legal representative of the change "business unit registration business license > Network Culture in the way of transfer of < actual control and permits the network culture operation license > on the interests of the many. The court to transfer the contract involves" network culture operation license > transfer transfer contract is invalid on the grounds that the sentence for violating "network culture operation license" shall not be transferable.
The third part is the analysis of ideas in judging the effectiveness of the internet transfer contract. The Court pointed out that the court in the process of determining the validity of the contract is not in accordance with the "Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the application of the contract law of People's Republic of China interpretation (two) > measure and some problems: the Supreme People's Court on the current situation of the trial of cases of disputes over civil and commercial contracts the guidance on the requirements of laws and regulations will explore and conflicting interests, but to assert that internet transfer contract is invalid because it violated the mandatory provisions of" network culture operation license >. This court shall not transfer directly determine the contract in violation of mandatory provisions of the contract and determine ways of thinking, flawed reasoning.
The fourth part introduces the criterion validity of the contracts in violation of mandatory provisions of the comparative law. The experience of Rome law, German law, Japanese law, Anglo American law, the effectiveness of China's Taiwan region and Mainland China's decision theory are introduced. In the theoretical summary of comparison experience introduced after that in theory there is monism and dualism. At the same time interpretation based on specified legislation adopted dualism standpoint.
In the fifth part, based on the combination of monism and dualism, the author intends to adopt the violating mandatory provisions of contract potency determination method. Firstly, analysis of the status of the general clause of Contract Law > < fifty-second fifth. Then, the author intends to use the method to determine the specific objective: To explore the mandatory provisions of public and private interests, and the measure of conflict.
The sixth part combined with the particularity of Internet cafes transfer contract, proposed transfer contract effectiveness judgment method. First, explore the specific provisions of the network culture operation license is to control the number of Internet cafes and Internet industry layout, maintain the order of operation. Second, put forward three steps of measuring interests. Firstly, points out specific regulations for the protection of the public interest are: the number of Internet cafes and Internet layout control, management order. Secondly, extract the interests of the parties may exist transfer contract: Internet cafe operators business interests, license cost benefits and changes to permit reliable interests. Finally, put forward the process of balancing of interests to transfer behavior is whether the parties consider reselling license subjective malicious.
The seventh part of the Internet in the case of the transfer of genre analysis, and put forward own views on this case. Firstly, to single Internet cafes transfer with entity shop transfer, no physical store monomer internet transfer and transfer of the Internet cafe stores three types and three types the internet transfer contract are put forward opinions. Finally, the opinions of the two cases in this paper are put forward.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】