第三人引诱违约责任研究

发布时间：2018-03-29 20:49

本文选题：第三人引诱违约　切入点：理论基础　出处：《新疆大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在发生第三人引诱违约时,受损害的债权人在自己的损失不能被债务人完全弥补或根本无法向债务人主张赔偿责任时,由于我国受债权相对性原则的影响,无法向第三人主张违约责任,从而得到救济。而目前我国的《侵权责任法》未将债权明确列入保护范围,所以债权人无法追究第三人的侵权责任。这就导致债权人很有可能寻求不到救济,完全违背了我国民法的基本理念。从各国立法、学界理论以及我国相关司法实践来看,建立第三人引诱违约责任迫在眉睫。这就要求确立第三人引诱违约的理论基础,并对其构成要件、行为模式、法律后果等进行分析。本文利用比较分析法、文献分析法、实证分析法来对第三人引诱违约责任进行研究。借鉴国外的相关理论,论述相关基础理论,大致分为三个部分对第三人引诱违约责任问题进行探讨分析。第一部分是第三人引诱违约责任的基本理论。首先对第三人引诱违约行为的渊源及概念进行论述。其次从债权相对性理论的突破、债权的不可侵性及第三人引诱违约行为的道德非难性,阐述了第三人引诱违约的理论依据。最后从英美法系、大陆法系国家中对于第三人引诱违约责任的规定进行了梳理及分析。第二部分是我国现行法律对第三人引诱违约责任规定的不足与思考。笔者从我国现行对第三人引诱违约行为的法律规定为出发点,论证了现行立法的不足,从而结合第三人引诱违约的理论基础分别从合同法及侵权责任法这两个角度论述立法的现实性。第三部分是第三人引诱违约责任的制度完善。笔者主要论述了第三人引诱违约责任的构成要件、责任承担及违法性阻却事由。其中着重分析了第三人应与债务人承担不真正连带责任责任的理由。结论部分为本文的观点总结。
[Abstract]:When a third party induces default, the injured creditor is affected by the principle of the relativity of creditor's rights when his own loss cannot be completely compensated by the debtor or can not claim liability from the debtor at all. It is impossible to claim liability for breach of contract from a third party and thus obtain relief. At present, the tort liability law of our country does not explicitly include the creditor's rights in the scope of protection. Therefore, the creditor cannot investigate the tort liability of the third party. This may lead to the creditor seeking no remedy, which completely violates the basic idea of civil law of our country. From the point of view of legislation, academic theory and relevant judicial practice of our country, It is urgent to establish the liability of the third party to seduce the breach of contract, which requires the establishment of the theoretical basis of the third party to induce the breach of contract, and the analysis of its constituent elements, behavior patterns, legal consequences, etc. This paper uses comparative analysis, literature analysis, etc. Empirical analysis method to study the liability of the third party to induce breach of contract. Draw lessons from the relevant foreign theory, discuss the relevant basic theory, The first part is the basic theory of the liability of the third party to induce breach of contract. Firstly, the origin and concept of the third party's inducement of breach of contract are discussed. Secondly, from the breakthrough of the theory of relativity of creditor's rights, The inviolability of creditor's rights and the moral irregularity of the third party's inducement of breach of contract are discussed, and the theoretical basis of the third party's inducement of breach of contract is expounded. In the countries of civil law system, the provisions of the liability of the third party to induce breach of contract are combed and analyzed. The second part is the deficiency and thinking of the current law of our country on the liability of the third party to induce the breach of contract. The author thinks from the current situation of our country on the liability of the third party. The starting point is the legal provisions of the act of inducement of breach of contract by a person, The shortcomings of the current legislation are demonstrated. The third part is the perfection of the system of the third party's inducement of breach of contract. The author mainly discusses the following two aspects: the third part is the perfection of the system of the liability of the third party to induce the breach of contract from the angle of the contract law and the law of tort liability. The constitutive elements of the liability of three persons to induce breach of contract, The reason why the third party and the debtor should bear the untrue joint and several liability is emphatically analyzed. The conclusion part is the summary of the viewpoint of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】