论有限公司股东查阅权的法律保护

发布时间：2018-05-28 08:04

本文选题：查阅权 + 正当目的　；参考：《复旦大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：有限公司的股东查阅权作为股东的一项基本权利,是股东实现其他股东权利的基础,它代表了一种利益的平衡和原有规则结构的突破。只有在适当的理论支持以及合理规则设计的前提下,这种权利的行使才能既保障股东利益又不会导致整个公司体系的紊乱。据此,从法经济学角度而言,股东查阅权是减少代理成本的重要机制,也是可明确原告主体资格的一种机制,通过对相关理论和如何使利益冲突双方达成平衡的探讨,以达到简化查阅权操作规程的目的,并满足有限公司股东查阅权在市场化经济现实中迫切需保障的要求。且从国内立法的不足和缺失来看,从比较法角度讨论关于股东查阅权的设计和相关规则的意义,参考英美法系及大陆法系国家对此类问题的立法与实践,再结合我国现有的关于股东查阅权的立法研究,对股东查阅权的有关规则设计进行讨论并提出建议。本文除去导论和结语之外,结构共有四章：第一章,股东查阅权的概念及现实问题的思考。本章通过阐明股东查阅权的概念,包括历史演变和价值论,对股东查阅权的概念进行统一,点明现代股东查阅权产生的意义,及其立法的价值,进而通过合同法和经济法学的角度进行讨论,奠定本文股东查阅权讨论的权利基础。通过对现实问题的思考,对行使程序以及救济途径进行全面的分析,充分揭示股东查阅的现实需要的必要性,以明确对有限公司股东查阅权进行研究的意义和目的,为后文的论述进行铺垫。第二章,股东查阅权的目的正当性分析。本章通过对公平的价值追求的法理学分析入手,探究由于信息不对称所导致的股东查阅权的目的正当性保护的法理学原因。由此进而对正当目的的证明和审查作立法和实践的考察,从股东对正当性目的的证明和法院对正当性目的的审查两个方面分析并指出股东查阅权目的正当性设定的必要性以及作为一种权利平衡的考察的重要机制在现实运用中的操作方法。第三章,股东查阅权比较法上的考察。本章通过对股东查阅权国内外制度比较法上的考察,对查阅范围及信息披露渠道的规定等方面,以普通法系和大陆法系的不同立法进行分析比较,并结合我国现有情况进行分析及建议。再通过对目前已出台的地方指导意见进行比较分析,从而引发对比较法考察的思考,参照国外的股东举证以及引入查阅代理人制度,探讨了诉讼时效的有无、起算及长短问题。第四章,完善国内股东查阅权的思考。引入检查人选任制度,有利于保护商业秘密,从第三方的角度保护股东和公司利益,第三人代为行使查阅权可弥补股东查阅的局限性,扩大查阅范围。加强法律条文的明确性和程序上的可操作性,以期对股东知情权制度本身、司法救济程序制度进行完善。以上四章所讨论的是代表现今社会股东查阅权的焦点所在,文章从立法本身和实践意义上进行思考,力求使查阅权在实践中遭遇的种种问题得以解决。
[Abstract]:The right to consult the shareholders of a limited company, as a basic right of shareholders, is the basis for shareholders to realize the rights of other shareholders. It represents a balance of interests and breakthroughs of the original rule structure. Only under the premise of appropriate theoretical support and reasonable rules, the exercise of this right can not only protect the interests of shareholders but also do not guide the shareholders. Therefore, from the perspective of law and economics, from the perspective of law and economics, the right to consult is an important mechanism to reduce the agency cost, and is also a mechanism to clarify the qualification of the plaintiff. Through the discussion of the relevant theories and how to make a balance between the two parties in the conflict of interest, the purpose of simplifying the operation rules of the right of access is achieved and satisfied. In view of the shortage and lack of domestic legislation, this paper discusses the significance of the design and relevant rules about the right to consult the shareholders from the perspective of comparative law, and then combines the legislation and practice of this kind of questions in common law and civil law countries, and then combines the existing customs of our country. In the legislative study of the right to consult the shareholders, this paper discusses the design of the relevant rules of the right to consult the shareholders and puts forward some suggestions. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the structure has four chapters.
The first chapter, the concept of the right to consult the shareholders and the thinking of the reality. By clarifying the concept of the right to consult the shareholders, including the historical evolution and the theory of value, the concept of the right to consult the shareholders is unified, the significance of the right to consult the modern shareholders, and the value of the legislation are discussed, and the discussion is made through the angle of contract law and economic law to lay a foundation for the discussion. In this paper, the right basis for the discussion of the right to consult the shareholders is set up. Through the consideration of the practical problems, a comprehensive analysis of the exercise procedures and the remedy ways is carried out to fully reveal the necessity of the practical needs of the shareholders' inspection, so as to clarify the significance and purpose of the research on the right to consult the shareholders of the limited company, and to paving the way for the later discussion.
The second chapter, the justifiable analysis of the purpose of the right to consult the shareholders. This chapter, starting with the jurisprudential analysis of the fair value pursuit, explores the jurisprudential reasons for the legitimate protection of the shareholders' right to look up the right due to asymmetric information. The proof of sexual purpose and the two aspects of the court's examination of the purpose of justifiable purposes are analyzed and the necessity of the justification of the purpose of the shareholders' right to look up and the operating methods in the practical application of an important mechanism as an important mechanism for a balance of rights.
The third chapter, the investigation of the comparative law of the shareholders' right to consult. This chapter analyzes and compares the scope of reference and the provision of information disclosure channels through the comparison between the domestic and foreign system of the right to consult the shareholders and the different legislation of the common law system and the civil law system. The previous local guidance has been compared and analyzed, thus triggering the consideration of the comparative law investigation, referring to the proof of the foreign shareholders and introducing the system of consulting agents, and discussing the problems of the limitation of litigation, the starting calculation and the length and short.
The fourth chapter, the thinking of improving the right to consult the domestic shareholders. Introducing the inspector selection system, it is beneficial to protect the business secrets and protect the interests of the shareholders and the company from the angle of the third party. The third people can make up for the limitation of the shareholders' inspection and enlarge the scope of reference. The system of judicial relief procedure is perfect for shareholders' right to know.
The above four chapters discuss the focus of the right to refer to the current social shareholders. The article thinks from the legislation itself and the practical significance, striving to solve the problems encountered in the practice of the right to consult.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】