缔约过失责任制度之赔偿问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-30 16:53

本文选题：缔约过失责任 + 诚实信用原则　；参考：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：缔约过失责任制度作为独立于违约责任和侵权责任的一大民事责任制度，它的产生与发展和社会经济的发展、商品交易的盛行密不可分。作为以诚实信用这一大民法原则为基础的缔约过失责任制度，它主要是为了弥补在缔约过程中，一方或双方当事人违背彼此之间产生的信赖关系时受到的利益损失。传统的违约责任和侵权责任并不能解决日常生活中出现的所有纷繁复杂的纠纷，在受害人无法援用违约或侵权责任来维护自己合法利益之时，缔约过失责任无疑成为了受害人的“救命稻草”，更好地保护了受害人的合法权益，维护了商品交易的健康发展，弥补了市场经济的缺陷，保障了社会的公平正义。为了更好地完善我国的民法体系，推动社会主义市场经济的发展，我国现行《合同法》明确规定了缔约过失责任制度。值得注意的是，《合同法》中缔约过失责任制度的规定却很笼统，只是宏观规定，对于其相关的很多内容都未作出进一步的规定，尤其是赔偿方面的问题。这无疑给司法实践带来了困难，也为本文提供了研究价值。本文分为五个部分：第一部分简单介绍了缔约过失责任的相关内容，主要包括其概念、构成要件、理论依据和历史发展；第二部分介绍了缔约过失责任赔偿的几种主要情形，明确了在哪些情况下行为人需要承担缔约过失责任；第三部分论述了缔约过失责任赔偿的对象，主要从信赖利益和固有利益两方面入手；第四部分论述了缔约过失责任赔偿的范围，这一部分也是本论文的核心部分，主要焦点集中在是否赔偿固有利益和是否局限于履行利益这两点上，，笔者在总结国内外民法学界学者的观点的基础上，提出了自己的看法；第五部分从理论到实践，介绍了在实践中，适用缔约过失责任制度进行赔偿时应注意的相关问题。
[Abstract]:As a civil liability system independent of the liability for breach of contract and tort liability, the system of fault liability in contracting is closely related to the development of society and economy and the prevalence of commodity trading. As a system of fault liability in contracting based on the principle of good faith, it mainly aims to make up for the loss of interests suffered by one or both parties when they violate the trust relationship between each other in the process of contracting. Traditional liability for breach of contract and tort liability can not solve all the complicated disputes that appear in daily life, when the victim can not use breach of contract or tort liability to protect their legitimate interests. The responsibility of contracting fault undoubtedly becomes the victim's "life-saving straw", better protects the victim's legal rights and interests, maintains the healthy development of commodity trade, makes up for the defects of market economy, and guarantees the fairness and justice of the society. In order to perfect the civil law system of our country and promote the development of socialist market economy, the current contract Law of our country clearly stipulates the liability system of contracting negligence. It is worth noting that the provisions of the system of fault liability in contract law are very general, but only macro provisions, for its many related content has not made further provisions, especially the issue of compensation. This undoubtedly brings difficulties to judicial practice and provides research value for this article. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part briefly introduces the related contents of fault liability in contracting, including its concept, constitutive elements, theoretical basis and historical development; the second part introduces several main cases of compensation for fault liability in contracting. In the third part, the author discusses the object of compensation for contracting negligence liability, mainly from the two aspects of trust interest and inherent interest. The fourth part discusses the scope of compensation for contractual negligence liability, which is also the core part of this paper, the main focus is on whether to compensate for the inherent interests and whether limited to the performance of the two interests. On the basis of summing up the views of civil law scholars at home and abroad, the author puts forward his own views. The fifth part, from theory to practice, introduces the relevant problems that should be paid attention to when applying the system of contracting fault liability in practice.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】