也谈劳动合同法的失衡问题——与董保华教授商榷

发布时间：2018-05-31 07:25

本文选题：劳动合同法 + 失衡　；参考：《浙江学刊》2017年06期

【摘要】：董保华教授在《〈劳动合同法〉的十大失衡问题》一文中提出《劳动合同法》中存在管制与自治的系统性失衡,表现为十个方面。通过对我国劳动合同法律实践的分析,以及对中国、法国、英国、俄罗斯、越南等五个代表不同法系、社会制度、经济发展水平的国家和其他更多国家劳动合同立法的比较,可以得出的结论是,除了"法律保护一刀切与分层分类适用的失衡"外,董文中其他九类失衡的论点在很大程度上难以成立。《劳动合同法》确实存在失衡,但不是管制与自治的系统性失衡,而是立法技术撑不起立法宗旨的技术性失衡。这种技术性失衡表现在法理和诸多具体制度上,在实施效果上表现为标准劳动关系和非标准劳动关系的极度失衡。
[Abstract]:Professor Dong Baohua put forward the systematic imbalance between regulation and autonomy in the "Labor contract Law", which is manifested in ten aspects. Through the analysis of the legal practice of labor contracts in China, as well as the comparison of labor contract legislation between China, France, Britain, Russia and Vietnam, five countries representing different legal systems, social systems, economic development levels, and other countries, It can be concluded that, in addition to the "imbalance between the one-size-fits-all and hierarchical classification of legal protection", the argument of the other nine categories of imbalances in Dong's paper is to a large extent difficult to hold. [Labor contract Law] does exist imbalance. But it is not the systematic imbalance between regulation and autonomy, but the technical imbalance that legislative technology cannot support. This kind of technical imbalance is manifested in the legal theory and many concrete systems, and the extreme imbalance between the standard labor relation and the non-standard labor relation in the implementation effect.
【作者单位】：浙江财经大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目《公共劳动管制法律问题的系统化研究》(15YJA820023) 国家社会科学基金重大项目《创新中国特色劳动关系协调机制研究》(15ZDA049)
【分类号】：D922.52

【相似文献】