生态文明视野下《核安全法》基本原则探析

发布时间：2018-03-16 07:07

本文选题：生态文明　切入点：核安全法　出处：《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："线性生态文明观"面临着难以自圆其说的逻辑漏洞,"系统生态文明观"应当成为检视和构建《核安全法》基本原则的指导性理念。《核安全法(草案)》中的"确保安全方针"与"安全第一原则"构成语义重复,同时放入基本原则条款无异于焚琴煮鹤;"纵深防御"并不具有原则的特质,更适宜作为一项制度进行规定;"严格管理"和"全面保障"宜合并为"全过程严格监管原则"。此外,从解释论的角度看,"责任明确原则"应当偏重理解为行政权力的"决策担责",方能从源头规避和治理核安全风险;从建构论的角度看,《核安全法》中应当增加"信息公开原则"和"公众参与原则",从而实现"监管核安全监管者"之目的。
[Abstract]:The concept of "linear ecological civilization" is faced with a logical loophole which is difficult to justify itself, and "system ecological civilization" should be the guiding idea to examine and construct the basic principles of the Nuclear Safety Law. The security policy and the "safety first principle" constitute a semantic repetition. At the same time, the inclusion of basic principle clauses is tantamount to incinerating the harp and boiling cranes; "deep defense" does not have the characteristics of principle and is more suitable for regulation as a system; "strict management" and "comprehensive protection" should be merged into the "principle of strict supervision throughout the whole process." in addition, From the angle of explanation theory, the principle of "clear responsibility" should be interpreted as "responsibility for decision-making" of administrative power so as to avoid and control the risk of nuclear safety from the source. From the point of view of constructivism, the "principle of information disclosure" and "principle of public participation" should be added to the Nuclear Safety Law, so as to achieve the purpose of "supervision of nuclear safety regulators".
【作者单位】：重庆大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“生态文明法律制度建设研究”(14ZDC029) 司法部重点项目“生态环境保护法律机制研究”(14SFB1009)
【分类号】：D922.67

【相似文献】