自然资源国家所有权的制度省思与权能重构

发布时间：2018-04-30 10:24

本文选题：自然资源国家所有权 + 权能　；参考：《中国地质大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年02期

【摘要】：我国现行法律体系规定了自然资源国家所有权制度,该制度在立法目的与制度逻辑上,确立了国家对于自然资源的概括所有,且其意义最为宽泛,但我国自然资源国家所有权制度的运行存在制度运行目标落空、制度实施逻辑错位、制度拓展引致质疑和制度后果功能异化等困境。既有研究从国家所有权权利构造、国家所有权权利实施异化和自然资源国家所有权物权化等角度反思了当前自然资源国家所有权制度,这些反思性研究指出了制度问题与症结,但也存在过于绝对、难以操作以及难以因应自然资源特殊性等问题。我们可以通过细化与具体化占有、使用、收益、处分这四项所有权权能内涵,以及拓展权能种类、体系化构建管理权能来完善自然资源国家所有权制度。
[Abstract]:The national ownership system of natural resources is stipulated in the current legal system of our country. In terms of legislative purpose and system logic, this system establishes the generalization of national ownership of natural resources, and its meaning is the broadest. However, the operation of the national ownership system of natural resources in our country has the difficulties such as the failure of the operating goal of the system, the dislocation of the logic of the implementation of the system, the doubt of the system development and the alienation of the function of the system consequence. The existing studies reflect on the current natural resources state ownership system from the perspectives of the structure of the state ownership right, the alienation of the implementation of the state ownership right and the property right of the state ownership of natural resources. These reflective studies point out the institutional problems and the crux of the system. But there are also too absolute, difficult to operate and difficult to cope with the particularity of natural resources and so on. We can perfect the national ownership system of natural resources through the refinement and concrete possession, use, income, disposition of the four ownership and power connotation, as well as the expansion of the types of power, systematic construction of management power.
【作者单位】：华侨大学法学院;武汉大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地武汉大学环境法研究所重大项目“环境法中的权利类型研究”(12JJD820010)
【分类号】：D923.2;D922.6

【参考文献】