对我国环境纠纷非讼解决模式的思考

发布时间：2018-05-17 11:57

本文选题：环境纠纷 + 非讼模式　；参考：《浙江农林大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 在现代社会,利用诉讼模式解决环境纠纷自有其独特的优势,但单纯依凭诉讼模式,其局限性也是显而易见的,因此研究并充分利用环境纠纷非讼解决模式具有重要的意义和价值。我国目前的环境纠纷非讼解决模式尚存在诸多问题,与一些相对成熟的国家相比还有不少差距,如民间调解制度运行不畅、行政处理的法律制度和资源利用不尽合理、仲裁制度被架空、信访制度处境尴尬、模式解纷效力和公正性保障不足、同诉讼模式衔接不良等。这些问题的存在,需要我们认真研究、分析并借鉴国外的成熟经验,探究我国的实际情况,在此基础上完善我国的环境纠纷非讼解决模式。结合美国、日本等国在环境纠纷非讼解决模式上的一些经验,完善我国的环境纠纷非讼解决模式可从如下几方面考虑:第一,加快健全我国环境纠纷非讼解决模式的法律机制,对行政处理进行专门立法以解决专门立法不足的问题,并加强环境信访的法律化规制,改变环境信访制度目前的尴尬处境;第二,通过增加环境行政仲裁模式、引进公害防止协议制度,促进我国环境纠纷非讼解决途径多元化的发展;第三,组织制度建设方面,设立环境纠纷民间调解机构、单独设置环境民事仲裁机构,切实迎合环境纠纷的一系列特殊解纷需求,重新设置环境纠纷行政处理部门以保障处理结果的公正性;第四,强化环境纠纷非讼解决模式与诉讼模式的衔接,通过司法保障增强环境纠纷非讼解决模式解纷结果的效力,全面完善我国的环境纠纷非讼解决模式。
[Abstract]:In modern society, the use of litigation mode to solve environmental disputes has its own unique advantages, but simply depending on the litigation model, its limitations are also obvious. Therefore, it is of great significance and value to study and make full use of the non-litigation solution mode of environmental disputes. There are still many problems in the current mode of non-litigation settlement of environmental disputes in our country. Compared with some relatively mature countries, there are still many gaps, such as the slow operation of the folk mediation system, the unreasonable utilization of the legal system and the resources of the administrative processing. The arbitration system has been set up, the petition system is in an awkward situation, the mode of resolving disputes is not effective and fair guarantee, and the litigation mode is not well connected, and so on. The existence of these problems requires us to seriously study, analyze and learn from the mature experience of foreign countries, explore the actual situation of our country, and improve the non-litigation solution mode of environmental disputes in our country on this basis. Based on the experience of the United States, Japan and other countries in the non-litigation mode of environmental dispute resolution, we can consider the following aspects to perfect the non-litigation solution mode of environmental dispute in China: first, to speed up and improve the legal mechanism of non-litigation settlement mode of environmental dispute in our country. Make special legislation to solve the problem of inadequate legislation, strengthen the legal regulation of environmental petition and visit, change the embarrassing situation of environmental petition system. Second, by increasing the mode of environmental administrative arbitration, The introduction of public hazard prevention agreement system to promote the development of non-litigation solutions to environmental disputes in China. Thirdly, the establishment of civil mediation agencies for environmental disputes and the setting up of environmental civil arbitration institutions separately. To meet a series of special needs of environmental disputes, to re-set up the administrative department of environmental disputes to ensure the fairness of the outcome; fourth, to strengthen the connection between non-litigation and litigation modes of environmental disputes, Through the judicial protection to enhance the effectiveness of the non-litigation solution model of environmental disputes and improve the non-litigation solution mode of environmental disputes in China.
【学位授予单位】：浙江农林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.68;D925

【相似文献】