环境民事纠纷行政处理之案例评析

发布时间：2018-05-18 15:11

本文选题：环境 + 民事纠纷　；参考：《西南政法大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 随着环境民事纠纷的增多,环境民事纠纷的解决机制面临新的挑战。环境民事纠纷行政处理制度是解决环境民事纠纷的有效途径,是环境民事纠纷解决机制的重要组成部分。但是,环境民事纠纷行政处理机制在我国尚处于起步阶段,相关的法律不够健全,相应的机构尚未设立。因此,我国应当尽快完善环境民事纠纷行政处理机制,以便于发挥该机制的优势。本文是通过对一则典型案例的分析来讨论环境民事纠纷行政处理制度的。文章共分为引言、正文、结语三个部分,其中正文包括以下四个部分: 第一部分介绍了一则环境民事纠纷行政处理案件,指出了本案的焦点是环境民事纠纷行政处理的方式和性质。第二部分主要介绍环境民事纠纷行政处理的基础理论。对环境民事纠纷行政处理案例的分析应当建立在对这些相关基础理论的正确把握之上。第三部分对环境民事纠纷行政处理案的争议与分歧意见作了全面分析。本部分指出了两种观点:环境民事纠纷行政处理就是行政调解;环境民事纠纷行政处理包括行政调解、行政裁决等。文章从环境保护部门的职责、法律的规定以及行政法理论这三个角度对两种观点进行了分析。第四部分是研究结论。本部分对环境民事纠纷行政处理的方式和性质作了准确界定,指出了我国环境民事纠纷行政处理的不足,并提出了完善我国环境民事纠纷行政处理的建议。环境民事纠纷的行政处理是一种纠纷解决机制,其方式不仅仅包括行政调解,还应当包括行政裁决等其他方式。同时,行政处理的性质应当根据其方式来确定。另外,笔者认为,从我国目前的法律环境与行政处理模式来看,我国环境民事纠纷行政处理方式应当明确规定为行政调解和行政裁决两种。
[Abstract]:With the increase of environmental civil disputes, the settlement mechanism of environmental civil disputes is facing new challenges. The administrative system of environmental civil disputes is an effective way to solve environmental civil disputes and an important part of environmental civil dispute resolution mechanism. However, the administrative mechanism of environmental civil disputes in our country is still in its infancy, the relevant laws are not perfect enough, and the corresponding institutions have not been set up. Therefore, our country should improve the administrative mechanism of environmental civil disputes as soon as possible, so as to give full play to the advantages of this mechanism. This paper discusses the administrative system of environmental civil disputes through the analysis of a typical case. The article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text includes the following four parts: The first part introduces an administrative case of environmental civil dispute, and points out that the focus of this case is the mode and nature of administrative handling of environmental civil dispute. The second part mainly introduces the basic theory of administrative handling of environmental civil disputes. The analysis of administrative cases of environmental civil disputes should be based on the correct understanding of these basic theories. The third part makes a comprehensive analysis of the disputes and differences in administrative cases of environmental civil disputes. This part points out two points of view: administrative treatment of environmental civil disputes is administrative mediation; administrative treatment of environmental civil disputes includes administrative mediation, administrative adjudication and so on. This paper analyzes the two viewpoints from three angles: the responsibility of environmental protection department, the regulation of law and the theory of administrative law. The fourth part is the conclusion of the research. This part has made the accurate definition to the environmental civil dispute administrative processing way and the nature, has pointed out our country environment civil dispute administration processing insufficiency, and has proposed the consummation our country environment civil dispute administration processing suggestion. The administrative handling of environmental civil disputes is a dispute settlement mechanism, which includes not only administrative mediation, but also administrative adjudication. At the same time, the nature of administrative treatment should be determined according to its mode. In addition, the author believes that from the current legal environment and administrative processing mode, the administrative treatment of environmental civil disputes in China should be clearly defined as administrative mediation and administrative adjudication.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D922.68

【参考文献】