我国环境公益诉讼制度完善研究——对常州毒地案一审判决的法理思考

发布时间：2018-11-18 09:39

【摘要】：为了应对日益严重的环境危机,我国法律制度引进了环境公益诉讼,但是从实践看实施并不理想。以常州毒地案件为代表的一些环境损害案件的判决凸显环境公益诉讼法律制度的设计缺陷,包括立法体系化不足、过于依赖行政权力、激励性规制不足以及原告资格局限等问题。这样的现实严重地减损了环境法治实现的进程,削弱了公众参与环境保护的积极性。从国外经验看,完善的公益诉讼制度对于推进环境保护、激励社会参与都具有十分重要的意义。完善我国的环境公益诉讼法律制度,要弱化行政权力对环境诉讼案件的干预,强化公益诉讼的社会参与和支持,注重环境公益诉讼规则设计的科学性和体系性,建立环境公益诉讼社会参与的社会保障制度,唯其如此,环境公益诉讼的制度目的才能实现。
[Abstract]:In order to deal with the increasingly serious environmental crisis, China's legal system has introduced environmental public interest litigation, but the practice is not ideal. The judgment of some environmental damage cases represented by Changzhou Duodie case highlights the defects in the design of the legal system of environmental public interest litigation, including inadequate legislative system and excessive reliance on administrative power. The incentive regulation is insufficient and the plaintiff qualification is limited and so on. Such reality seriously detracts from the realization of environmental rule of law and weakens the enthusiasm of public participation in environmental protection. From the experience of foreign countries, perfect public interest litigation system is very important for promoting environmental protection and encouraging social participation. To perfect the legal system of environmental public interest litigation in China, we should weaken the interference of administrative power in environmental litigation cases, strengthen the social participation and support of public interest litigation, and pay attention to the scientific and systematic design of environmental public interest litigation rules. Only by establishing the social security system of social participation in environmental public interest litigation can the purpose of environmental public interest litigation be realized.
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学广州市绿色经济与环境能源法研究中心;
【分类号】：D922.68

【相似文献】