以渔民诉企业侵权案分析环境侵权民事责任
发布时间：2019-01-18 21:23
【摘要】：随着经济的迅速发展,人们在追求利益的同时,大规模地扩张各种产业,各种环境问题应运而生,并呈现越来越严重的趋势。与此同时,环境侵权行为也层出不穷。近些年,公民的环境权利意识得到了提高,人们更多地希望通过法律的途径来救济自己、保障自身的合法权利。在我国的法律体系中,《民法通则》、《环境保护法》及其他环境单行法中都对环境民事侵权责任制度做了相关规定。可以说,我国环境侵权民事责任的法律依据已经比较完善,环境侵权民事责任制度体系已基本形成。 但是在实践中,具体的环境侵害原因、程度及侵害后果都很难确定,这就导致在技术层面上很难实现实体正义。众所周知,在环境侵权案件中,当事人双方的地位是实质上是不平等的。被害方往往是普通的公民,而侵权一方通常则是被国家承认的一定的经济实体。在这种不平等的关系中,如何保障被害方的权益显得尤为重要。 本文中,笔者所选取的渔民诉企业环境侵权一案具有一定的代表性,该案不仅是普通的环境侵权案件,其中还包括共同侵权及混合责任等理论问题。笔者通过对比一审和二审判决的相同点及差异,找出案件的焦点问题,从立法和司法实践等方面进行解读分析,得出合法合理的处理结果,并通过理论分析提出相应的立法建议,以求能够对环境侵权的相关理论研究和实践操作有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy, people expand a variety of industries on a large scale while pursuing interests, and various environmental problems emerge as the times require, and present a more and more serious trend. At the same time, environmental tort acts also emerge in endlessly. In recent years, the awareness of environmental rights of citizens has been improved, people more hope to relief themselves through the way of law, to protect their legal rights. In the legal system of our country, the general principles of civil law, environmental protection law and other environmental law all make relevant provisions on environmental tort liability system. It can be said that the legal basis of civil liability for environmental tort in China has been relatively perfect, and the system of civil liability for environmental tort has basically formed. However, in practice, it is difficult to determine the causes, extent and consequences of environmental damage, which leads to the difficulty of realizing substantive justice on the technical level. As we all know, in environmental tort cases, the status of both parties is essentially unequal. The victim is often an ordinary citizen, while the tortfeasor is usually an economic entity recognized by the state. In this unequal relationship, how to protect the rights and interests of the victim is particularly important. In this paper, the case of fisherman v. enterprise environmental tort selected by the author has a certain representativeness. This case is not only an ordinary environmental tort case, but also includes joint tort and mixed liability. By comparing the similarities and differences between the first instance and the second instance, the author finds out the focus of the case, interprets and analyzes it from the aspects of legislation and judicial practice, and draws the legal and reasonable results. And put forward the corresponding legislative suggestions through theoretical analysis, in order to be able to relevant theoretical research and practical operation of environmental tort benefit.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923;D922.68
本文编号：2411129
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy, people expand a variety of industries on a large scale while pursuing interests, and various environmental problems emerge as the times require, and present a more and more serious trend. At the same time, environmental tort acts also emerge in endlessly. In recent years, the awareness of environmental rights of citizens has been improved, people more hope to relief themselves through the way of law, to protect their legal rights. In the legal system of our country, the general principles of civil law, environmental protection law and other environmental law all make relevant provisions on environmental tort liability system. It can be said that the legal basis of civil liability for environmental tort in China has been relatively perfect, and the system of civil liability for environmental tort has basically formed. However, in practice, it is difficult to determine the causes, extent and consequences of environmental damage, which leads to the difficulty of realizing substantive justice on the technical level. As we all know, in environmental tort cases, the status of both parties is essentially unequal. The victim is often an ordinary citizen, while the tortfeasor is usually an economic entity recognized by the state. In this unequal relationship, how to protect the rights and interests of the victim is particularly important. In this paper, the case of fisherman v. enterprise environmental tort selected by the author has a certain representativeness. This case is not only an ordinary environmental tort case, but also includes joint tort and mixed liability. By comparing the similarities and differences between the first instance and the second instance, the author finds out the focus of the case, interprets and analyzes it from the aspects of legislation and judicial practice, and draws the legal and reasonable results. And put forward the corresponding legislative suggestions through theoretical analysis, in order to be able to relevant theoretical research and practical operation of environmental tort benefit.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923;D922.68
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张浩强;论共同环境侵权[J];当代法学;2002年02期
2 叶金强;;侵权构成中违法性要件的定位[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年01期
3 傅剑清;;论环境侵害救济的立法困境及其突破[J];法律适用;2010年Z1期
4 徐贵瑶;;环境侵权刍议[J];法制与社会;2010年02期
5 滕克越;;环境侵权民事责任典型问题探析[J];法制与社会;2010年03期
6 刘轶;;共同侵权理论问题研究[J];法制与社会;2010年35期
7 王玲然;;试论我国环境侵权的无过错归责原则[J];法制与社会;2011年24期
8 苗延波;;论环境污染侵权责任的归责原则及其具体类型[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2006年06期
9 戴茂华;吴萍;;我国环境侵权民事责任制度的立法完善[J];江西社会科学;2011年06期
10 浦纯钰;朱竟艳;;论环境侵权责任的构成要件[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2008年05期
，本文编号：2411129
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2411129.html
