环境公益诉讼案引发的思考

发布时间：2019-06-19 22:26

【摘要】： 近年来,我国存在这样一种现象：一方面,随着经济社会的发展,环境污染事件日益增多,受到社会广泛关注,环境侵权纠纷不同于一般的民事纠纷,不仅纠纷原因具有复杂性,而且所侵害的利益具有明显的公益性；另一方面,环境公益诉讼一波三折,环境维权举步维艰,污染事件的责任者往往得不到应有的法律制裁。本文以广东省首例环境公益诉讼案和“贵州环境公诉第一案”为题材,论述我国有关环境公益诉讼的一些思考。通过写作本文提倡一种观念那就是环境保护不仅是政府的事,也不是单靠环保部门来解决问题,它同样需要企业的支持、配合以及社会的参与,期待环境公益诉讼制度能够进一步完善。本文共分五章。第一章,案情介绍及问题的提出。主要介绍了两例典型环境公益诉讼案件、并对案件进行评述,指出其中涉及的法律问题,并在接下来展开进一步深入讨论。第二章,围绕环境公益诉讼主体资格问题进行讨论,指出我国目前立法上关于原告资格的缺陷,并提出了完善意见,意在扩大诉讼主体资格更好的保护公共环境。第三章,对环境公益诉讼范围进行分析,首先理论分析影响可诉范围的因素,接着对环境民事、行政诉讼的范围进行概括,明确对哪些环境污染损害能提起诉讼,哪些事件不属于法院管辖的问题。第四章,针对环境公益诉讼中存在滥用诉权等不规范问题,提出一些规范建议,以充分保证公民的环境诉讼权又防止权力的恣意。第五章,通过对环境侵权行为构成要件的分析,使人们对环境侵权行为有更明确的认识,进一步结合我国民法通则、环境保护法、2010年即将实施的侵权责任法讨论了环境侵权责任承担问题。
[Abstract]:In recent years, there is such a phenomenon in our country: on the one hand, with the development of economy and society, environmental pollution incidents are increasing day by day, which is widely concerned by the society. Environmental tort disputes are different from general civil disputes, not only the causes of disputes are complex, but also the infringed interests have obvious public welfare; On the other hand, environmental public interest litigation twists and turns, environmental rights protection is difficult, those responsible for pollution incidents often do not get due legal sanctions. Based on the first case of environmental public interest litigation in Guangdong Province and the first case of environmental public prosecution in Guizhou, this paper discusses some thoughts on environmental public interest litigation in China. Through writing, this paper advocates the concept that environmental protection is not only a matter of the government, but also does not rely solely on environmental protection departments to solve the problem. It also needs the support of enterprises, cooperation and social participation, and expects that the environmental public interest litigation system can be further improved. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter, the introduction of the case and the introduction of the problem. This paper mainly introduces two typical cases of environmental public interest litigation, comments on the cases, points out the legal issues involved, and then further discusses them in depth. The second chapter discusses the qualification of the subject of environmental public interest litigation, points out the defects of plaintiff qualification in the current legislation of our country, and puts forward some suggestions for perfecting it, in order to expand the qualification of litigation subject and protect the public environment better. The third chapter analyzes the scope of environmental public interest litigation, first theoretically analyzes the factors that affect the scope of litigation, and then summarizes the scope of environmental civil and administrative litigation, and clarifies which environmental pollution damage can be brought and which events do not belong to the jurisdiction of the court. The fourth chapter, in view of the abuse of the right of action in environmental public interest litigation and other non-standard problems, put forward some normative suggestions to fully ensure the environmental litigation rights of citizens and prevent the wanton of power. The fifth chapter, through the analysis of the constituent elements of environmental tort, makes people have a clearer understanding of environmental tort, and further discusses the liability for environmental tort in combination with the general principles of civil law, environmental protection law and the tort liability law to be implemented in 2010.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D925;D922.68

【引证文献】