第三人侵权致提供劳务者受害赔偿请求权制度的立法完善
发布时间:2018-02-14 00:03
本文关键词: 第三人侵权 提供劳务者 请求权 出处:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:第三人侵权致提供劳务者受害赔偿,既是提供劳务者受害赔偿的特殊类型,也是侵权案件的特殊类型,在实践中处理起来相当复杂,但现行法律对此种关系的规定却很有限,尤其是在请求权行使和归责原则方面存在不少模糊和空白之处,如何认定和处理在司法上赋予了法官太多的自由裁量权,导致尺度无法统一,请求权行使也相当混乱。《侵权责任法》颁行后,将提供劳务者受害赔偿的归责原则明确为按过错承担责任,直接导致《最高法院人身损害赔偿解释》中受害劳务者请求选择权失去相应基础依据。鉴于新旧法之间衔接不畅,应明确废止《最高法院人身损害赔偿解释》第十一条第一款的规定。既然受害劳务者不再享有向侵权第三人和接受劳务者的赔偿请求选择权,就应该有新的制度来平衡各方当事人的利益。按照侵权责任法的过错原则,关于自然人之间形成的劳务关系中发生的第三人侵害,因其与违反安全保障义务的补充责任类型较为相近,二者在主体、归责原则、过错性质和利益维护上均存在高度一致性,因此,应在侵权责任法中引入有限补充责任制度,在第三人侵权致提供劳务者受害时,明确以第三人承担侵权责任为前提,以接受劳务者承担侵权责任为补充的请求权制度。
[Abstract]:The third party torts the victim compensation to the provider of labor service, is not only the special type of the victim compensation of the service provider, but also the special type of the tort case. In practice, it is quite complicated to deal with, but the current law has very limited provisions on this kind of relationship. In particular, there are many ambiguities and gaps in the exercise of the right of claim and the principle of imputation. How to identify and deal with the fact that too much discretion has been given to the judge in the administration of justice, which leads to a lack of uniform standards. After the enactment of the Tort liability Law, the principle of imputation of compensation for victims of labor providers is clearly defined as taking responsibility according to fault. As a direct result of the Supreme Court's interpretation of personal injury compensation, the injured labor workers' request for the right to choose loses the corresponding basis. In view of the lack of convergence between the new and the old laws, The provisions of Article 11th, paragraph 1, of the interpretation of personal injury compensation by the Supreme Court should be expressly repealed. Since the injured worker no longer has the option to claim compensation to the third party and the person receiving the service, There should be a new system to balance the interests of the parties concerned. According to the principle of fault in tort liability law, the third party infringement in the labor relations formed between natural persons, Because it is close to the type of supplementary liability for violating the obligation of safety and security, there is a high degree of consistency in the subject, the principle of imputation, the nature of fault and the maintenance of interests, so the limited supplementary liability system should be introduced into the law of tort liability. When the third party infringes upon the provider of labor, it is clear that the system of claim is based on the premise that the third party bears the tort liability and the accepting person assumes the tort liability as a supplement.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谢婧;;第三人侵权致雇员损害之雇主责任探究——兼析《最高人民法院<关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释>》第11条[J];法制博览;2016年28期
2 张军;;工伤保险待遇补偿与民事侵权赔偿问题的思考[J];中国医疗保险;2016年09期
3 杨曦希;董正远;;雇员可同时诉求雇主和侵权人赔偿[J];人民司法;2015年14期
4 李冬;王洋;;《侵权责任法》个人用工责任的正确理解与适用[J];法制与社会;2014年17期
5 杨立新;赵晓舒;;我国《侵权责任法》中的第三人侵权行为[J];中国人民大学学报;2013年04期
6 匡青松;;不真正连带责任诉讼中若干实务问题探析[J];求索;2010年10期
7 王竹;;侵权法的体系化展开与类型化研究——杨立新教授侵权法思想研究[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2010年05期
8 姜强;;《侵权责任法》中的连带责任、不真正连带责任及其诉讼程序[J];法律适用;2010年07期
9 巩坚;;工伤与第三人侵权竞合的法律适用问题[J];消费导刊;2010年04期
10 喻承跃;;工伤赔偿与民事侵权赔偿的关系——从司法审判的角度审视[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2008年04期
,本文编号:1509408
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1509408.html