刑法与民法的“分”“合”之辨

发布时间：2018-02-20 22:49

  本文关键词： 立体刑法学 刑法 民法 刑法与民法 违法性标准 谦抑性原则　出处：《北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：刑法与民法在规范目的、调整手段等方面迥异,但不能简单地将两者对立化,刑法与民法的关系体现在两者"分""合"的理解上。"分"是两者所调整的行为在社会危害性上的区分,"合"是两者对致害事件的规制互相补充、互相影响,两者对致害事件的处理不可或缺。刑法规制具有严重社会危害性的行为,而危害不大的行为则交由民法调整,且随着社会认知的变化而改变,刑法与民法的界分也应随之做动态调整。在对待刑法与民法的关系上,既要警惕刑法优先适用的思维,遵守刑法的谦抑性,也应注意不能以民事判断代替刑事判断,更应分别运用民法规范和刑法规范对行为进行定性。
[Abstract]:Criminal law and civil law are quite different in the aspects of normative purpose and adjustment means, but they can not be simply opposed to each other. The relationship between criminal law and civil law is embodied in the understanding of "division" and "combination" between them. "division" is the distinction between the two regulated behaviors in social harmfulness, and "harmony" is the complementary regulation and mutual influence between them on the harmful events. The regulation of criminal law has serious social harmfulness behavior, but the behavior with little harm is transferred to civil law to adjust, and change with the change of social cognition. The distinction between criminal law and civil law should be adjusted dynamically. In dealing with the relationship between criminal law and civil law, we should not only be alert to the thinking of priority application of criminal law, abide by the modesty of criminal law, but also pay attention not to substitute civil judgment for criminal judgment. More should use the civil law norm and the criminal law norm separately to carry on the qualitative analysis to the behavior.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目资助(11BFX129)
【分类号】：D923;D924
，

本文编号：1520246