发生在上海越剧院的名誉权案与服务商责任——实施“网络人身权纠纷司法解释”的一个难点

发布时间：2018-02-22 05:31

  本文关键词： 上海越剧院 网络服务提供者 司法解释 侵权责任法 终审判决 民事纠纷案件 网络侵权 信息网络 侵权行为 侵权人 　出处：《青年记者》2015年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正虽然我国《侵权责任法》第36条已对网络服务提供者在网络侵权纠纷中的责任作出了特殊规定,2014年《最高人民法院关于审理利用信息网络侵害人身权益民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》(以下简称"网络侵权司法解释")又作出了具体解释,但是在司法实践中对认定网络服务提供者的责任仍然存在难点。在去年11月江西省萍乡市中级人民法院对发生在上海越剧院的利用微博侵害他人名誉权纠纷的终审判决中,新
[Abstract]:Although Article 36 of the Tort liability Law of our country has made special provisions on the liability of network service providers in network infringement disputes, in 2014, the Supreme people's Court tried the civil correction of infringement of personal rights and interests by using information network. The provisions on the Application of certain issues of the Law in dispute cases. (hereinafter referred to as "judicial interpretation of network infringement"), a specific interpretation has been made. However, in judicial practice, there are still some difficulties in determining the responsibility of network service providers. In November last year, the Pingxiang City Intermediate people's Court of Jiangxi Province issued a final judgment on the dispute over the use of Weibo's right of reputation by Weibo in Shanghai Yue Theatre.
【分类号】：D923
，

本文编号：1523745