虚拟财产的概念共识与法律属性——兼论《民法总则》第127条的理解与适用

发布时间：2018-03-02 00:34

本文关键词： 虚拟财产法律属性物债二分权利客体《民法总则》　出处：《东方法学》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：虚拟财产和虚拟财产权的法律属性是虚拟财产纠纷法律适用的连接点和法律规则体系构建的基点。既有研究受"虚拟财产"中"财产"一词的误导,直接将虚拟财产定性为财产权的客体并将其置于"物债二分"的财产权体系之下的研究进路存在比较严重的物法思维倾向。"物债二分"体系并非财产权体系的全部,虚拟财产作为权利客体也并非当然地属于物权或债权的客体。超越"物债二分"的财产权体系,可以发现虚拟财产并非单一权利的客体,同一虚拟财产可能同时为多种权利之客体,虚拟财产权也并非单一的权利而是包含多种权利的权利束。虚拟财产作为多元权利的客体属性是由其信息本质所决定的,同一信息的不同内容可分别对应着不同的权利。《民法总则》第127条将虚拟财产定位为民事权利的客体,但并未指明其属于何种权利的客体,这为虚拟财产作为多种权利客体的定位提供了解释论的基础。司法实践中法院在处理虚拟财产权纠纷时应根据个案被侵害的法益判断被侵害的虚拟财产是作为何种权利之客体进而选择相应的裁判规范。
[Abstract]:The legal attribute of virtual property and virtual property right is the connecting point of the application of virtual property dispute law and the basic point of legal rule system construction. The existing research is misled by the term "property" in "virtual property". There is a serious tendency of thinking in the way of thinking about virtual property as the object of property right and put it under the system of property right with "property debt dichotomy", which is not the whole system of property right. Virtual property, as the object of right, does not belong to the object of real right or creditor's right, and it can be found that virtual property is not the object of a single right. The same virtual property may be the object of many rights at the same time, and the virtual property right is not a single right but a bundle of rights including many rights. Different contents of the same information may correspond to different rights. Article 127 of the General provisions of Civil Law defines virtual property as the object of civil rights, but does not specify what kind of object it belongs to. This provides a basis for interpretation of virtual property as the object of many kinds of rights. In judicial practice, courts should judge what kind of virtual property is infringed according to the legal interests that the case is infringed upon when dealing with the dispute of virtual property. The object of the kind of right then chooses the corresponding judgment norm.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【基金】：山东大学青年团队项目“中国民法典编纂若干问题研究”(项目批准号:IFYT1506)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D923.1

【相似文献】