论债权人代位权中的担保前置

发布时间：2018-03-02 01:02

本文关键词： 代位权债的保全债的担保债之相对性　出处：《天津大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：债权人代位权是债法赋予债权人的一项法定权利,与债权人撤销权共同组成债之保全制度,在债法体系中系属债之履行。担保法律制度是民法的另一项基本制度,其中既涉及债法的领域,也包含物权法的内容。一般学术研究较少将二者联系起来进行理论分析与思考,但在司法实务上,代位权诉讼中涉及担保的问题早已引起了法官的注意。因此,本文进行研究的基本目的,即探究债权人代位权与担保法律制度之间的联系,从而发现二者之间的前后置关系。本文通过大量案例的比较分析和国内外民法学者相关研究的探讨,得到在债权人代位权诉讼中担保应当前置的基本结论。支持这一基本结论的理由主要是,从其法理基础来看,债权人代位权是对债之相对性的突破,而担保权产生于民事法律主体之间的合意;从其现实原因来看,我国的债权人代位权制度设计带来了一系列现实负面影响,而担保前置可有效地控制这些负面影响。诚然,担保前置并不意味着绝对的、无条件的前置,而是在适当的情况下以适当的方式实现。对此,需要区分本人担保与他人担保——前置的实现方式是有所区别的。这些结论一方面完善、发展了债权人代位权制度,回答了未曾被系统地回答过的代位权与担保之间关系的问题,另一方面有助于弥合实务上对担保是否前置的立场分化,避免矛盾判决的出现,因此具有创新的理论和现实意义。
[Abstract]:The creditor's right of subrogation is a legal right given to the creditor by the debt law. It forms the preservation system of the debt together with the creditor's right of rescission, and belongs to the performance of the debt in the debt law system. The legal system of security is another basic system of the civil law. It involves not only the field of debt law, but also the content of property law. Therefore, the basic purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between the creditor's subrogation and the legal system of security. In this paper, through the comparative analysis of a large number of cases and the study of civil law scholars at home and abroad, The main reason to support this basic conclusion is that the creditor's subrogation is a breakthrough in the relativity of debt. And the security right arises from the agreement between the civil legal subjects, and from its realistic reasons, the design of the creditor's subrogation right system in our country has brought a series of realistic negative effects, and the security preposition can effectively control these negative effects. The guarantee preposition does not mean an absolute, unconditional preposition, but is implemented in the appropriate manner in the appropriate circumstances. It is necessary to distinguish between the way in which one's guaranty is realized and the other's guarantee. These conclusions, on the one hand, perfect, develop the system of creditor's subrogation, and answer the question of the relationship between subrogation and security, which has not been systematically answered. On the other hand, it is helpful to bridge the position differentiation of whether the guarantee is preemptive in practice and to avoid the appearance of contradictory judgment, so it has innovative theoretical and practical significance.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】