《民法总则》无权代理法律责任体系研究

发布时间：2018-03-21 19:39

本文选题：民法总则　切入点：无权代理　出处：《清华法学》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：现行法关于无权代理责任的规定过于原则,缺乏可操作性,司法实务因此多借助表见代理制度来保护相对人的利益,以牺牲被代理人的利益为代价维护交易安全。无权代理责任属于法定担保责任,不以代理人的过错为成立要件。无权代理行为因被代理人拒绝追认而无效的,无权代理人应当对信赖代理权存续的相对人承担无权代理责任。本文针对《民法总则》第171条的规定和司法实践中存在的诸多问题,对无权代理责任的适用前提从主体和客体两个方面进行阐释,对其产生的主客观因素进行分析论证,并根据代理人是否知道自己欠缺代理权来区分代理人应承担责任的范围。在对无权代理责任进行全面、系统分析的基础上,从法教义学的视角对《民法总则》第171务作出解释。
[Abstract]:The provisions of the current law on unauthorized agency liability are too principled and lack of maneuverability. Therefore, the judicial practice often relies on the apparent agency system to protect the interests of the relative party. Maintaining transaction security at the expense of the interests of the principal. The unauthorized agency liability belongs to the statutory liability of security, and does not take the fault of the agent as the essential element of its establishment. The act of unauthorized agency is invalid because the principal refuses to ratify it, The unauthorized agent should bear the unauthorised agency responsibility for the relative person who relies on the right of agency. This article aims at the provisions of Article 171 of the General principles of Civil Law and the problems existing in judicial practice. The applicable premise of unauthorized agency responsibility is explained from two aspects of subject and object, and the subjective and objective factors are analyzed and demonstrated. According to whether the agent knows that he lacks the agency power to distinguish the scope of the agent's responsibility, on the basis of the comprehensive and systematic analysis of the unauthorized agency's responsibility, the author explains the 171st task of the General principles of Civil Law from the perspective of legal dogma.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学比较法学研究院中德法学研究所;
【基金】：中国政法大学校级项目——“立法研究模式下法律行为分析”项目(16ZFG82007)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】