善意取得下物权行为的无因性研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 01:34

本文选题：善意取得　切入点：物权行为无因性　出处：《新疆大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：社会经济发展飞快,人民生活水平也稳步新高度。为了保护国家和社会公共利益,促进市场经济下规范化交易。“无因”论的叫嚣声愈来愈凶猛,大有非此无交易之势。相比德国、我国台湾地区而言,我国当前的有关立法所采用仍是债权形式的变动规则。实践运用时,极少数的人才能够清楚地娓娓道来其中的内在逻辑。其实泾渭分明的区分原则与抽象原则,却总是被极富高深的逻辑体系混淆了。写这篇文章是希望对我国物之所有权的取得进行多视角,多方位的研析,呈现出脉络清晰的物之权利取得的理论模式,找到一个切实有效,有迹可循的方式方法。文章共分为四个部分:第一部分,对本文要重点研究对象——无因论的起源、历程、理论初心、功能价值与其在理论和现实社会适用的过程中所突兀出来的短板。第二部分,紧密联系“无因“论适用的具体实践——物之权利的取得,通过阐释各代表国所采的变动模式,与在规范交易环境、规制交易秩序不同模式下所使用的不同制度理念及优劣之势。第三部分,集中分析物之权利的取得内在的深层理论基础——公示原则,并与对适用公示原则的另外一种交易保护制度——善意取得的统一与差异性的对比。第四部分,对上述三部分分析做出价值判断,对照我国当前所采的物之权利取得模式及立法理念,并对我国在规范交易环境、规制交易秩序应有的制度设计。
[Abstract]:In order to protect the national and social public interests and promote standardized transactions under the market economy, the clamour of the "no-cause" theory is becoming fiercer and fiercer. Compared with Germany, the Taiwan region of our country, the current relevant legislation of our country still adopts the changing rule of the form of creditor's rights. When it is applied in practice, A very small number of people are able to articulate the inner logic clearly. In fact, there is a clear distinction between the principle of distinction and the principle of abstraction. This article is written in the hope of a multi-angle and multi-directional analysis of the acquisition of property rights in our country, and presents a theoretical model of the acquisition of the right to things in a clear context. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part focuses on the research object of this paper-the origin, the course, the initial theory of the theory. Function value and its short board in the process of theory and social application. The second part, closely related to the "no cause" theory of the application of the specific practice-the right to obtain, through the interpretation of the representative countries adopted by the change model, The third part focuses on the deep theoretical basis of the acquisition of the rights of objects-the principle of publicity, which is used in different modes of regulating the trading environment and regulating the order of transactions. And the comparison with the unity and difference of bona fide acquisition of another transaction protection system that applies the principle of publicity. The fourth part, make a value judgment to the above three parts of the analysis, In contrast to the right acquisition mode and legislative idea of the property adopted at present in our country, the system design of regulating the trading environment and regulating the order of transaction in our country should be made.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】