中国近代民法法典化的理论论争——兼论对中国当下编纂民法典之启示

发布时间：2018-04-23 21:18

本文选题：中国近代 + 民法法典化　；参考：《政法论坛》2017年03期

【摘要】：在中国近代民法法典化进程中,民法学界围绕着民法法源、悬赏广告性质、典权性质、家制和宗祧继承之存废、女子继承权等诸问题,在理论层面展开过热烈的论争。这些论争,或涉及域外移植而来之民法条文的解读,或涉及中国固有民事法在欧西民法语境中之诠解,或涉及亲属继承领域民事固有法之存废。学者们在论争中通过对上述具体问题的理论追问,充分表达了他们对中国近代民法典编纂过程中一些根本性问题的"立法忧虑"和"知识关怀"。今日重温这些理论论争,可以发现其对中国当下的民法典编纂,仍可提供良多启示。
[Abstract]:In the process of codification of civil law in modern China, there have been heated debates on the sources of civil law, the nature of reward advertisement, the nature of pawning power, the existence and abolition of the family system and the inheritance of the clan system, the inheritance of women and so on. These arguments are related to the interpretation of the civil law provisions transplanted from abroad, the interpretation of the Chinese inherent civil law in the context of Western civil law, or the preservation and abolition of the inherent civil law in the field of relative inheritance. In the debate, scholars have fully expressed their "legislative concern" and "knowledge concern" for some fundamental problems in the process of compiling the civil code in modern China through the theoretical questioning of the above specific issues. Reviewing these theoretical debates today, we can find that they can provide a lot of enlightenment to the current compilation of Chinese civil code.
【作者单位】：福州大学法学院;
【基金】：笔者主持之国家社科基金项目“中国近代民法继受视野中的固有法衍化研究”(项目编号:15BFX028)的阶段性成果 2013年“福建省高校新世纪优秀人才支持计划”项目资助
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】