我国建筑作品著作权保护问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-24 07:00

本文选题：建筑作品 + 著作权　；参考：《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：建筑作品作为我国著作权法的客体经历了一个从无到有、不断发展的历程。我国于1990年制定第一部《著作权法》之时并未将建筑作品作为一个独立客体纳入著作权保护,而是在2001年修订现行《著作权法》时才将其与美术作品并列纳入著作权的保护。随着实务当中建筑作品著作权纠纷的日益增多,现行法律已经不能有效保护建筑作品著作权人的合法权益。本文从建筑作品的保护范围、独创性判断标准、侵权复制方式以及侵权救济方式四个方面为切入点,结合国内建筑作品的典型案例进行深入分析,指出其存在的问题与不足,并参照国外相关的法律规定和司法实践经验提出我国建筑作品在保护范围、独创性判断标准、侵权复制方式以及侵权救济方式四个方面的完善建议。本文在运用著作权法基本原理的前提下对各问题的讨论尽量按照建筑类设计图纸、建筑模型、建筑物或构筑物三者分别展开,这不仅有助于我们理解法学意义上对同一独创性艺术美感所具有不同表达方式的保护意义,也符合建筑学意义上各作品的设计、制作、施工等建筑工艺流程。从法学和建筑学的交叉视角来进行分析有助于我们理解建筑作品的应然保护范围;从各作品的制作工艺流程来分析有助于我们理解建筑类设计图纸、建筑模型、建筑物或构筑物三者的独创性标准是一个由高到低的渐变过程;从三者自身存在的维度出发我们可以更加清楚的理解对各作品的侵权复制方式;在完善三者的侵权救济方式上本文并未将其分别开来进行阐述,而是依然依据著作权法规定的赔礼道歉、消除影响等救济方式对其综合分析以保证对建筑作品权利人救济的整体性、系统性。时值我国《著作权法》第三次修改之际,希望本文的论述能够对建筑作品著作权保护有所裨益。
[Abstract]:As the object of copyright law, architectural works have experienced a process of development from scratch. When our country formulated the first copyright Law in 1990, it did not bring the building work into the copyright protection as an independent object, but brought it into the copyright protection only when the current copyright Law was revised in 2001. With the increasing disputes over the copyright of construction works in practice, the current law can no longer effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of the copyright owners of construction works. In this paper, the scope of protection of architectural works, the criteria of originality, the way of tort reproduction and the way of tort relief are taken as the breakthrough point, and combined with the typical cases of domestic architectural works, the problems and shortcomings are pointed out. With reference to the relevant foreign laws and regulations and judicial practice experience, the author puts forward four perfect suggestions on the scope of protection, the criterion of originality, the way of tort reproduction and the way of tort remedy in our country. On the premise of applying the basic principles of copyright law, this paper tries to discuss various problems according to the architectural design drawings, building models, buildings or structures, respectively. This not only helps us to understand the legal sense of the same original artistic aesthetic sense of the protection of different expressions, but also in line with the architectural sense of the design, production, construction and other construction process. Analysis from the angle of law and architecture helps us to understand the scope of protection of architectural works, and from the production process of each work to help us understand architectural design drawings, architectural models, The originality standard of buildings or structures is a gradual process from high to low. In order to perfect the three ways of tort relief, this paper does not separate them from each other, but still apologizes according to the copyright law. The comprehensive analysis of relief means such as eliminating influence ensures the integrity and systematicness of relief to the right holders of architectural works. At the time of the third revision of China's copyright Law, it is hoped that the discussion in this paper will benefit the copyright protection of construction works.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】