论动产抵押的公示

发布时间：2018-05-13 08:46

本文选题：动产抵押 + 登记　；参考：《西南民族大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：动产抵押制度对经济社会的推进发展具有重要意义。学者王泽鉴就曾指出:“通过比较法方面来看,我们会发现,一个国家市场经济的发展与其动产抵押制度的发达程度是成正比的”。动产抵押制度建立的作用在于,既可扩宽市场主体的资金融通方式,还可使得动产的效能得到极大的发挥。1995年我国通过《担保法》的颁布,正式在我国引入并建立动产抵押制度。新制度的引入难免存在缺陷,对此我国也一直在努力进行对动产抵押制度的深入研究探索。直至2007年《物权法》的颁布,动产抵押的登记制度在此得到了一定的改善,但其中对于动产抵押应如何打破传统占有公示的束缚,从而进行强有力的公示,以及公示方面的相关规定,现行法仍未能安排妥善。如动产抵押制度的登记形式、登记机关、公示方式和登记客体等方面。选择登记公示方式的确便于当事人或是第三人对于动产权利负担的知悉。相对于传统民法理论上的动产固有的占有公示方式,两者在如何进行公示的方法上产生了碰撞。登记公示方式相对于动产原先固有的占有公示方式,外部性显得十分欠缺。结合现实状况而言,如我国可对日本或台湾地区在动产抵押公示方面的相关规定进行借鉴汲取,并结合我国国情,采取以登记的公示方式为主,对动产标的物外部进行打刻标识为辅,可有效解决由单纯的登记公示方式而引起的公示效力外部性欠缺难题。动产抵押制度的设立初衷,是为了给予个人与企业通过以动产抵押的方式取得融资,以便进行交易活动,促进我国市场经济运行发展。以个人与企业为服务主体,那么其机制运行也应从主体的角度出发。社会经济的快步发展对于效率的要求不断提高,如能为个人与企业的融资打造一个,统一的登记制度与登记机关、简便快捷的登记程序、查询动产权利负担情况的便捷等高效率运作的动产抵押大环境,辅助个人与企业积极为我国经济增速贡献一份力。可惜的是,对于这些方面,现行法仍有做得不够细致之处。需要不断贴合实践,从实践中吸取经验,发现问题,不断进步。动产抵押制度的引进无疑是我国法律制度的一大进步,而我国也仍在对其进行不断发展与完善,从各个细节上修缮完整,从而最大值发挥动产抵押制度的功效。为化解动产抵押当事人和善意第三人两者间因动产抵押公示引起的利益冲突,维护交易市场稳定和安全。本文在此通过综合动产抵押制度在不同法系中发展的历史脉络,对比国内外动产抵押制度发展变化与相关规定,对其阐述剖析,并依据我国现行法法律条文与解释,指出我国动产抵押公示存在的不足之处。结合上述,从我国国情与实务情况出发,提出相关解决建议。
[Abstract]:The system of chattel mortgage is of great significance to the development of economic and social development. Scholar Wang Zejian once pointed out: "through comparative law, we will find that the development of a national market economy is directly proportional to the developed degree of the chattel mortgage system." the role of the establishment of chattel mortgage system lies in expanding the market subject. The way of financing can also make the performance of the chattel play a great role in the.1995 year. China has introduced and established the chattel mortgage system formally in our country through the promulgation of the "guarantee law". The introduction of the new system is unavoidable, so our country has also been trying to carry out the deep research and exploration of the chattel mortgage system until 2007. The registration system of chattel mortgage has been improved here. However, the current law has not been properly arranged, such as the registration form of the chattel mortgage system, the registration form, the public mode of publicity, as to how the chattel mortgage should break the bondage of the traditional possession, so as to make a strong publicity and the relevant provisions in the public display. The choice of registration is indeed convenient for the party or the third party to know the burden of the right of chattel. In combination with the actual situation, for example, we can draw lessons from the relevant provisions of the public display of chattel mortgage in Japan or Taiwan, and combine the national conditions of our country, take the registration form as the main way, and make an effective solution to the mere boarding of the object of movable property. The original intention of the establishment of the system of chattel mortgage is to give individuals and enterprises to obtain financing through the way of chattel mortgage, so as to carry out transaction activities and promote the development of the market economy in our country. The operation of the mechanism should also be from the main body of the individual and the enterprise. From the angle of body, the rapid development of the social economy has increased the demand for efficiency, such as creating a personal and enterprise financing, a unified registration system and registration authority, a simple and quick registration procedure, a convenient and efficient way to mortgage a movable property, such as the convenience of the rights and burdens of chattel, to assist the individual and the enterprise. It is a great contribution to our country's economic growth. Unfortunately, the current law is still not careful enough for these aspects. It is necessary to continue to fit in with practice, draw experience from practice, find problems and make continuous progress. The introduction of the system of chattel mortgage is undoubtedly a great progress of our legal system, and our country is still continuing to develop it. In order to defuse the interests conflict between the chattel mortgages and the bona fide third party, safeguard the stability and safety of the trading market, this article through the comprehensive chattel mortgage system in the different legal systems. In the context of history, this paper compares the development and changes of the domestic and foreign chattel mortgage system with relevant provisions, and expounds the analysis of it, and points out the shortcomings of the public notice of chattel mortgage in our country according to the legal provisions and interpretation of the current law in our country.

【学位授予单位】：西南民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】