消费者保护加倍赔偿法律制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-31 07:32

本文选题：消费者 + 加倍赔偿　；参考：《郑州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：消费者保护加倍赔偿制度在我国消费者保护领域中具有重要地位,发挥着抑制潜在违法行为,维持社会整体经济利益的功能。从1994年初次引进起,消费者保护加倍赔偿制度所面临的争议便不绝如缕,这些争议主要围绕加倍赔偿制度的性质、合理性、加倍赔偿金额的确定、配套政策的实施等问题。《消费者权益保护法》修改时,加倍赔偿制度取得一定程度的变革,但未形成突破性进展,由此造成消费者在行使加倍赔偿请求权时面临诸多问题。在依法治国深度推进,经济发展谋求新常态的今天,加深对可以倒逼市场信用体系建设的消费者保护加倍赔偿制度的研究很有必要。对于消费者保护加倍赔偿制度的研究,首先应当从其一般理论出发,对其在古代时期、中世纪时期和近代时期的不同发展进程作以分析,辨明适当的法律概念,分析其法律属性、制度价值和理论基础,以为整篇论述打好铺垫。请求权分析涉及法律条文的规范性和适用效果,是台湾学者王泽鉴推崇的民法思维方法。通过对消费者保护加倍赔偿制度中消费者的请求权以及经营者的抗辩进行分析,可以发现我国法律条文在适用中存在消费者定义不清、欺诈认定依据不协调、加倍赔偿金收效甚微等问题。对于这些问题的解决,需要借鉴域外消费者保护加倍赔偿制度的近况,在对域外制度阐述的基础上,得出对我国制度建设的启示。在完善我国消费者保护加倍赔偿制度方面,应当从内容和路径两方面着手,在内容上应当对“生活消费需要”作扩大解释、完善欺诈认定规范、合理设置加倍赔偿金,在路径选择上应当追求立法的协调性、司法解释的具体性以及案例指导制度的实用性。基于这样的思路,本文通过比较分析方法、历史研究方法、请求权分析路径,首先对消费者保护加倍赔偿制度的历史渊源、法律属性、法律价值、理论基础进行论述;其次,对我国消费者保护加倍赔偿制度的沿革进行介绍,对其中存在的问题,尤其是在请求权规范中存在的问题进行分析;然后,通过对域外消费者保护加倍赔偿制度的介绍与分析,得出对我国制度建设的启示;最后综合论述,对我国消费者保护加倍赔偿制度的完善提出内容和路径方面的建议。
[Abstract]:The system of double compensation for consumer protection plays an important role in the field of consumer protection in China. It plays the role of restraining potential illegal behavior and maintaining the economic interests of society as a whole. Since its first introduction in 1994, there have been numerous disputes over the system of double compensation for consumer protection. These disputes mainly revolve around the nature, rationality and determination of the amount of double compensation. When the Law on Protection of Consumer Rights and interests is amended, the double compensation system has made a certain degree of change, but no breakthrough has been formed, which makes consumers face many problems in exercising the right to double compensation. With the advancement of governing the country according to law and the seeking of a new normal for economic development, it is necessary to deepen the research on the system of double compensation for consumer protection which can force the construction of market credit system. To study the system of double compensation for consumer protection, we should first of all start from its general theory, analyze its different development process in ancient period, medieval period and modern period, and distinguish the proper legal concept. Analyze its legal attribute, system value and theoretical basis, lay the groundwork for the whole discussion. The analysis of the right of claim involves the normative and applicable effect of the legal provisions and is the thinking method of civil law advocated by Wang Ze-jian, a Taiwanese scholar. Through the analysis of the consumers' claim right and the operator's defense in the system of double compensation for consumer protection, we can find that the definition of consumer is not clear in the application of the legal provisions of our country, and the basis of fraud identification is not coordinated. Double the amount of compensation has little effect and so on. To solve these problems, we need to draw lessons from the recent situation of the system of double compensation for consumer protection abroad, and draw inspiration to the construction of our country's system on the basis of expounding the extraterritorial system. In perfecting the system of double compensation for consumer protection in our country, we should start from two aspects: content and path. In terms of content, we should expand the explanation of "living consumption needs", perfect the criterion of fraud identification, and reasonably set up double compensation. We should pursue the coordination of legislation, the concreteness of judicial interpretation and the practicability of case guidance system. Based on this way of thinking, this paper discusses the historical origin, legal attributes, legal value and theoretical basis of the system of double compensation for consumer protection through comparative analysis methods, historical research methods, and the path of claim analysis. This paper introduces the evolution of the system of double compensation for consumer protection in China, analyzes the existing problems, especially in the norms of the right of claim, and then, through the introduction and analysis of the system of double compensation for consumer protection abroad, Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of double compensation for consumer protection in China.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.8

【参考文献】