论作为侵权法上抗辩事由的第三人行为

发布时间：2018-06-20 14:10

本文选题：第三人行为 + 抗辩事由　；参考：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：《侵权责任法》第28条规定:“损害是因第三人造成的,第三人应当承担侵权责任”。因该条规定于《侵权责任法》第三章不承担责任和减轻责任的情形之下,由此确定了第三人行为属侵权责任法中的抗辩事由。《侵权责任法》虽于多处规定中涉及第三人,但并非所有关于第三人的规定均为抗辩事由意义上的第三人。抗辩事由意义上的第三人,应指承担侵权责任的主体。在无过错责任的适用领域,因其归责的严格性,第三人行为并不能作为当然的抗辩事由被适用,法律存在明确规定的情况下方可适用;当法律未规定的无过错责任与现有法律规定相类似时,可以类推适用。因第三人行为中断了侵权人行为与被侵权人损害之间的因果关系,故应发生免责的法律效果。在判断何种第三人行为可中断因果关系时,应重点考量第三人行为的类型及法律规范的目的。
[Abstract]:Article 28 of the Tort liability Act states: "the damage is caused by a third person, and the third party shall bear tort liability." Since this article is stipulated in Chapter III of the Tort liability Law, which does not bear liability and mitigates liability, it is thus determined that the conduct of a third party is a defense in the tort liability law. Although the Tort liability Law involves a third person in a number of provisions, But not all the provisions about the third party are the third party in the sense of defense. The third party in the sense of defense should refer to the subject of tort liability. In the application field of no-fault liability, due to its strict imputation, the third party's behavior can not be applied as a natural defense, only when the law has clear provisions. When no-fault liability under the law is similar to existing legal provisions, it can be applied by analogy. Since the third party's behavior breaks the causality between the infringer's behavior and the infringer's damage, it should have the legal effect of exemption. In determining what kind of third party behavior can break the causality, we should consider the type of third party behavior and the purpose of legal norm.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】