涤除权制度相关问题研究
发布时间:2018-07-12 17:36
本文选题:涤除权 + 《物权法》第191条 ; 参考:《中国社会科学院研究生院》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:作为一项重要的救济性权利,涤除权制度曾在登记公示制度缺位的时期为不动产受让人提供了极为重要的保护。时至今日,涤除权制度仍然在抵押物交易领域发挥着独特的作用。但在当前的框架内,由于《物权法》第191条存在着较为明显的缺陷与不足,导致涤除权制度在理论上存在着一些争议,更在实践中面临着困境。因此,本文先行对涤除权制度的基本内容和特点进行了概述,并结合我国的现行法对主要争议进行了综合分析,继而从实务角度对具体问题提出了适用条件和认定标准,以期建构一种更加符合我国实际需要的涤除权制度。对于与涤除权制度有关的理论性问题,文章通过对物权法第191条进行综合分析,认为我国的涤除权制度已经基本建立起来,但涤除权制度的理论争议还是需要通过立法手段解决。而在涤除权的实务领域问题中,文章以涤除金额的认定为核心,指出涤除金额的认定应当以抵押财产的实际价格与债务总额为依据。在抵财产物转让领域中,涤除权制度具有独特的价值。本文通过分析认为,随着立法实践的继续推进,理论上的重大争议应当能够得到逐步解决。在此背景下,应当把关注重点逐步转移到涤除权制度主要内容与具体适用上来。从而更加有效地回应客观现实的需求,更好地将制度所追求的价值体现在实践之中。
[Abstract]:As an important relief right, the system of the right of purge once provided extremely important protection for the transferee of immovable property during the absence of the system of registration and publicity. Today, the system of purge is still playing a unique role in the field of mortgage trading. However, in the current framework, due to the more obvious defects and deficiencies in Article 191 of the Real right Law, there are some theoretical controversies in the system of purge and abrogation right, and they are faced with difficulties in practice. Therefore, this paper first summarizes the basic contents and characteristics of the system of purging and removing rights, and analyzes the main disputes synthetically in combination with the current law of our country, and then puts forward the applicable conditions and identification standards for the specific problems from the practical point of view. In order to build a more in line with the actual needs of China, the right to purge the system. With regard to the theoretical problems related to the system of purging the right of removal, the article, through a comprehensive analysis of Article 191 of the property Law, holds that the system of the right of purge and the removal of the right has basically been established in our country. However, the theoretical dispute of the system of purge right still needs to be resolved by legislative means. However, in the practical field of the right of purge, the paper takes the confirmation of the amount of the cleanup as the core, and points out that the determination of the amount should be based on the actual price of the mortgaged property and the total amount of the debt. In the field of property transfer, the system of purging right has a unique value. According to the analysis, with the development of legislative practice, the major disputes in theory should be solved step by step. In this context, the focus should be gradually shifted to the main content and specific application of the system. In order to more effectively respond to the needs of the objective reality and better reflect the value pursued by the system in practice.
【学位授予单位】:中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 赵林青;;涤除权制度之我见[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2006年03期
2 陈英;抵押权追及效力浅析——兼谈抵押物受让人的涤除权[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2005年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 潘晓璇;抵押物第三取得人行使涤除权的要件[N];人民法院报;2004年
2 记者杨通河;贵州高院终审首例涤除权案[N];法制日报;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 夏莉莉;论涤除权制度[D];大连海事大学;2017年
2 汤硕;涤除权制度相关问题研究[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2017年
3 刘建;涤除权制度探究[D];黑龙江大学;2015年
,本文编号:2117964
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2117964.html