论网络转载摘编作品应适用著作权法定许可制度

发布时间：2019-01-26 20:25

【摘要】：著作权人对作品享有的人身权利和财产权利仅与作者的创作以及作品的表现形式有关,而与作品是否出现在媒介上、出现在何种媒介上无关。著作权法定许可制度作为一项既展示著作权的私权利性质,又展示著作权客体的公共性的制度,对于网络作品与纸质媒体上作品的保护形式不一致,显然不符合著作权保护立法的初衷,也难以在理论上自圆其说。报刊转载法定许可制度在实现权利人报酬方面的效果不佳并不是制度本身有缺陷所致,而是配套机制孱弱导致制度未被切实执行的结果。强化执法环境与条件、完善配套制度,是任何一种著作权许可制度得到贯彻的必要条件。应当通过具体措施完善著作权法定许可制度,如赋予网络转载、摘编主体著作权法定许可权,加快互联网转载付酬机制建设,利用大数据优势加强互联网监管,建立多元化知识产权纠纷解决机制等。
[Abstract]:The personal and property rights enjoyed by copyright owners over works are only related to the author's creation and the forms of expression of the works, but not to whether the works appear in the media or what medium they appear in. As a system that not only shows the nature of private rights of copyright, but also the publicity of copyright object, the legal license system of copyright is inconsistent with the forms of protection of works in the network and in the paper media. Obviously, it does not accord with the original intention of copyright protection legislation, and it is difficult to justify itself in theory. The poor effect of the legal license system in realizing the remuneration of the obligee is not the result of the defects of the system itself, but the result of the weakness of the supporting mechanism which leads to the failure of the system to be carried out in practice. Strengthening the law enforcement environment and conditions and perfecting the supporting system are the necessary conditions for any copyright licensing system to be carried out. We should perfect the legal license system of copyright through concrete measures, such as endowing network reprint, abridging the subject of copyright as the license right, speeding up the construction of Internet reprint payment mechanism, and taking advantage of big data to strengthen Internet supervision. The establishment of diversified intellectual property dispute resolution mechanism.
【作者单位】：人民出版社新华文摘杂志社;
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】