记名提单及其项下的货物交付问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-10 16:52

本文选题：记名提单　切入点：物权凭证　出处：《上海海事大学》2005年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着国际贸易的发展,记名提单在海运实务的普通货物运输中被大量使用,因而有关记名提单的争议和纠纷也日益增多。但是不同国家和地区的法律对于记名提单的规定差异很大,所以各国法院在审判实践中对这一问题的态度也不尽一致。在研习了近期几例审判结果相异的案例后,笔者认为有必要对记名提单及其项下的货物交付问题作一番深入的研究。笔者从记名提单与提单的关系入手,运用比较法学的研究方法,参考国际公约、英美等主要航运国家的法律以及我国现行海商法,并结合大量典型案例,对记名提单的法律性质及其项下的货物交付义务展开论述。全文共分四章。第一章简要介绍了记名提单的概念以及各国对于记名提单是否属于提单的规定。由于各国对此规定不同,因此笔者强调要讨论记名提单的相关问题必须明确是在何国法律框架下进行,否则讨论将因法律背景的不确定而变得不可能。第二章从分析提单的三个基本功能入手,研究记名提单的法律性质。其中重点探讨记名提单是否具有物权凭证的属性。笔者追本溯源,从英国法的角度来考察“物权凭证”的原始含义。在明确了“Document of Title”所代表的权利之后,再根据记名提单是否可以转让,分别讨论不同法律体制下它的物权凭证属性,其中主要论述了美国、英国和我国法下记名提单是否具有物权凭证性质。第三章是全文的重点。随着记名提单无单放货纠纷的增多,记名提单下承运人是否要凭单放货成为司法界、理论界及商贸航运界关注的焦点。笔者通过对比国内外最新的审判司法实践,引用国际公约的相关规定,对我国现行有关记名提单无单放货的法律机制进行分析和检讨,并在此基础上对修改我国海商法中有关记名提单的条款提出自己的一孔之见。第四章运用国际私法中的准据法理论,并援引典型案例分别论述违约和侵权两种诉因下该如何解决记名提单的法律冲突问题。最后就实践中出现的使用记名提单所带来的风险提出若干防范的建议。
[Abstract]:With the development of international trade, bearer bills of lading are widely used in the shipping practice of ordinary goods transportation. As a result, disputes and disputes concerning registered bills of lading are also increasing. However, the laws of different countries and regions have very different provisions on bills of lading. After studying several recent cases with different results, the author thinks that it is necessary to make a deep study on the delivery of the registered bill of lading and the goods under the bill of lading. The author starts with the relationship between bill of lading and bill of lading, applies the research method of comparative law, refers to international conventions, the laws of major shipping countries such as the United States and the United States, as well as the current maritime law of our country, and combines with a large number of typical cases. The legal nature of the bill of lading and its obligation to deliver the goods under the bill of lading are discussed. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter briefly introduces the concept of straight bill of lading and the provisions of various countries on whether the bill of lading belongs to the bill of lading. Therefore, the author emphasizes that the relevant issues of bill of lading must be discussed clearly under the legal framework of the country, otherwise the discussion will become impossible because of the uncertainty of the legal background. The second chapter begins with the analysis of three basic functions of bill of lading, and studies the legal nature of bill of lading. The original meaning of "document of title" is investigated from the angle of English law. After the rights represented by "Document of Title" are clarified, the property of document of title under different legal systems is discussed separately according to whether the bill of lading is transferable. It mainly discusses whether the bill of lading has the property of document of title under the law of America, England and our country. The third chapter is the focus of the full text. With the increase of disputes over the delivery of registered bills of lading, whether or not the carrier should release goods on bills of lading has become a judicial field. By comparing the latest judicial practice at home and abroad, and citing the relevant provisions of international conventions, the author makes an analysis and review on the current legal mechanism of delivery of registered bills of lading without bills of lading in China. On the basis of this, the article about bill of lading in the maritime law of our country is revised. Chapter 4th applies the theory of applicable law in private international law, Some typical cases are cited to discuss how to solve the conflict of laws between breach of contract and tort. Finally, some suggestions on how to prevent the risk caused by the use of bill of lading in practice are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：上海海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：D996.19;D912.29

【相似文献】