当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 商法论文 >

国际融资租赁标的物所有人的取回权利探析

发布时间:2018-03-29 10:16

  本文选题:国际融资租赁 切入点:破产取回权 出处:《山东大学》2005年硕士论文


【摘要】:融资租赁自20世纪50年代开始,席卷了全球西方发达国家的金融业。作为现代租赁业的重要标志,其具有诸多独特的交易特征。具体到法律领域,这些独特的交易特征所带来的法律关系的变化对传统的民商法构成的挑战。它突破了传统民商法关于所有权、担保、租赁、代理等法律关系的概念,创设出一种新型的特殊的法律关系,与其他金融法律理论相比,国内外关于国际融资租赁租赁法律问题的研究还尚欠成熟。 本文仅针对融资租赁中的所有人以取回租赁物的方式对所有权的保护问题进行研究。全文共分三大部分:第一章是有关融资租赁相关概念的概述,介绍了融资租赁的概念和融资租赁标的物的特点及所有权问题用比较的方法分析了融资租赁与所有权和普通租赁与所有权的差别,从而指出融资租赁所有权的特殊性质。第二章是本文的核心部分,共分六小节。第一节论述了取回权问题的由来。第二节取回权的性质问题。第三节中论述了“实质的所有人”,该部分依民法基本原理为据着重介绍了租赁标的物所有人。第四节介绍取回权的分类。笔者于本部分论述中大胆地提出不同于以往任何观点,表现在两方面:有权取回租赁标的物的所有权人并不仅限于租赁关系中的出租人,还包含买卖合同下的供货方;取回租赁物的救济方法不限于传统意义上承租人破产时出租人的取回权,或称一般取回权或破产取回权,还应当包括出租人破产时,破产管理人的取回权、承租人根本违约时出租人取回租赁物的救济,以及在租赁物交付之前,所有权尚未转移时发生的供货方取回租赁物的权利。下面的几节谈到与取回权有关的其他法律问题,包括取回权利行使不能时的救济、取回的方式和程序要求等。第三章是中国融资租赁取回权立法现状与完善。 本文写作的特点,始终依据民法基本原理作基础贯穿全文,同时结合破产法及合同法有关违约的法律规定。结合世界主要国家的立法优点以及《国际融资租赁公约》中的合理内容,针对中国的现行融资租赁立法保障所有权人的利益的实体和程序法方面提出了一点建议。
[Abstract]:As an important symbol of modern leasing industry, financial leasing has many unique transaction characteristics since 1950s, which has swept the financial industry of western developed countries all over the world. The changes in legal relations brought about by these unique characteristics of transactions pose a challenge to traditional civil and commercial law. It breaks through the traditional concepts of legal relations such as ownership, security, lease, agency, etc. A new kind of special legal relationship has been created. Compared with other financial legal theories, the research on the legal issues of international financial leasing is still immature at home and abroad. This paper focuses on the protection of ownership by the owner of the financial lease by taking back the lease. The thesis is divided into three parts: the first chapter is an overview of the related concepts of financial lease. This paper introduces the concept of financial lease, the characteristics of the subject matter of financial lease and the problem of ownership. The difference between financial lease and ownership and ordinary lease and ownership is analyzed by comparative method. The second chapter is the core part of this paper. It is divided into six sections. The first section discusses the origin of the issue of the right to take back. The second section deals with the nature of the right of return. The third section deals with the "substantial owner", which focuses on the subject matter of lease according to the basic principles of civil law. Section IV introduces the classification of the right to return. There are two aspects: the owner who has the right to take back the subject matter of lease is not limited to the lessor in the lease relationship, but also includes the supplier under the contract of sale and purchase; The remedy for obtaining the lease item is not limited to the lessor's right to take back the lease item in the traditional sense when the lessee goes bankrupt, or the general right to take back or the right to take back from bankruptcy, but should also include the right of the bankruptcy administrator when the lessor goes bankrupt, Relief for the lessor to recover the lease item upon the lessee's fundamental breach of contract, and the right of the supplier to recover the lease item that has not yet been transferred before the delivery of the lease item. The following sections address other legal issues relating to the right of return, The third chapter is about the current situation and perfection of the legislation of the right of recovery of financial leasing in China. The characteristics of this article are always based on the basic principles of civil law. At the same time, it combines the legal provisions of bankruptcy law and contract law on breach of contract, combined with the legislative advantages of major countries in the world and the reasonable contents of the Convention on International Financial Leasing, This paper puts forward some suggestions on the substantive and procedural law of protecting the interests of the owner in the current legislation of financial lease in China.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2005
【分类号】:D996

【引证文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 曹慧;论国际融资租赁中的破产取回权[D];中国政法大学;2011年

2 管丽;破产法上的取回权制度探析[D];苏州大学;2011年

3 王妍娟;我国飞机融资租赁法律制度研究[D];南京航空航天大学;2007年



本文编号:1680687

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/1680687.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户aa5c3***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com