中韩两国产品质量责任制度之比较

发布时间：2018-05-03 16:21

本文选题：产品责任 + 产品缺陷　；参考：《延边大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 随着我国经济建设的蓬勃发展，一方面，日益丰富多样的物质产品使人民的物质生活需求得到了极大地满足，另一方面，由于利益驱使，假冒伪劣产品也充斥市场，极大地危害了消费者的合法权益，有关产品质量责任而提起的诉讼也接踵而至。本文以民商法基本理论为依据，运用普遍与特殊、共性与个性、一般与个别的马克思主义辩证思维方法。对中韩两国产品质量责任制度进行了较为系统和深入的比较研究，在分析两者之间的共性与个性的基础上，借鉴了韩国有关产品质量责任制度的先进之处，提出了完善我国产品质量责任制度的若干建议。全文共分五章。其中正文分为四章。第一章主要论述了产品质量责任制度的一般理论，即产品质量责任的定义、法律特征、构成要件以及归责原则等四个方面内容。首先，对产品责任和产品质量责任这两个容易混淆的概念进行了比较分析，从而明确了产品责任与产品质量责任的联系与区别。其次，对产品质量责任的法律特征、构成要件进行了论述。最后，重点论述了产品质量责任的归责原则。这样，为在下文中对中韩两国产品质量责任制度进行比较打下了理论基础。产品质量责任归责原则的转变集中体现了法律的功能由道义性的惩罚向功利性补偿的转变，实现了形式正义到实质正义的法律选择。第二章主要介绍了中国的产品质量责任制度。目前，我国尚无一部独立的产品质量责任法，有关产品质量责任的规定主要在《产品质量法》中体现。我国的产品质量责任制度还不成熟，缺乏规范性和统一性。本章主要考察了中国的产品质量责任制度的形成与发展，产品的定义、范围、缺陷，产品质量责任的损害赔偿与免责事由，以及产品质量责任的诉讼时效与除斥期间等内容。第三章我们考察了韩国的产品质量责任制度。韩国的产品质量责任制度主要规定在《制造物责任法》中。本章中分别从制造物责任法的形成与发展，产品的定义、范围、缺陷，产品质量责任的损害赔偿与免责事由，，以及产品质量责任的诉讼时效与除斥期间等内容。第四章对中韩两国有关产品质量责任制度的内容进行了比较，并通过借鉴韩国有关产品质量责任制度的先进理论的理念内容，从产品的范围与产品缺陷的认定标准，产品质量责任的损害赔偿范围与抗辩事由，产品质量责任的诉讼时效与除斥期间等三个方面提出了健全和对完善我国的产品质量责任制度的建议，以更好地适应国际国内形势的发展，使我国的产品质量责任制度顺应国际产品质量责任制度发展趋势。
[Abstract]:With the vigorous development of our country's economic construction, on the one hand, the increasingly rich and diverse material products have greatly satisfied the material needs of the people; on the other hand, because of the interests, fake and inferior products are also flooding the market. Great harm to the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, product quality liability and litigation followed. Based on the basic theory of civil and commercial law, this paper applies the general and special, general and individual Marxist dialectical thinking methods. This paper makes a systematic and in-depth comparative study on the product quality liability system between China and South Korea. On the basis of analyzing the commonness and individuality between the two countries, it draws lessons from the advanced parts of the product quality responsibility system in Korea. Some suggestions are put forward to perfect the product quality responsibility system in China. The full text is divided into five chapters. The text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter mainly discusses the general theory of product quality liability system, that is, the definition of product quality responsibility, legal characteristics, constitutive requirements and the principle of imputation. Firstly, the concepts of product liability and product quality responsibility are compared and analyzed, and the relationship and difference between product liability and product quality responsibility are clarified. Secondly, the legal characteristics of product quality responsibility, the constituent elements are discussed. Finally, the principle of imputation of product quality responsibility is discussed emphatically. In this way, it lays a theoretical foundation for the comparison of product quality liability system between China and South Korea. The transformation of the principle of imputation of product quality responsibility embodies the transformation of the function of law from moral punishment to utilitarian compensation and realizes the legal choice from formal justice to substantive justice. The second chapter mainly introduces the product quality responsibility system in China. At present, there is no independent product quality liability law in our country. China's product quality responsibility system is not mature, lack of standardization and unity. This chapter mainly examines the formation and development of product quality liability system in China, the definition, scope, defects, damages and exonerations of product quality liability, as well as the limitation and exclusion period of product quality liability. The third chapter examines the product quality liability system in Korea. South Korea's product quality liability system is mainly stipulated in the Manufacturing liability Act. In this chapter, the formation and development of product liability law, product definition, scope, defects, product quality liability damages and exonerations, as well as the limitation period and exclusion period of product quality liability, are discussed in this chapter. The fourth chapter compares the content of product quality liability system between China and South Korea, and by referring to the concept content of Korea's advanced theory on product quality responsibility system, from the product scope and product defect identification standard. The scope and defense of product quality liability, the limitation of product quality liability and the period of product quality liability are proposed to perfect and perfect the system of product quality liability in our country. In order to better adapt to the development of the international and domestic situation, make the product quality responsibility system of our country conform to the development trend of the international product quality responsibility system.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】