论商与商法

发布时间：2018-05-20 14:42

  本文选题：商法 + “商”　； 参考：《北京商学院学报》1992年05期

【摘要】：正 如何理解“商”是一个很值得研究的问题。古今中外对“商”有着不同的理解。我国古代《汉书》认为“通财鬻货日商”;《白虎通》认为“商其远近,度其有无,通四方之物,故谓之商”;《书经》认为“懋迁有无化居”为商。在国外,学者卫伯斯特认为商是商品交换或买卖行为;布拉克认为商是货物、生产品或任何种类财物之交换。经济学上的“商”与法学上的“商”又各有不同,并且各国法律认定的“商”也有差异。本文仅就社会主义市场经济条件下对“商”的理解,谈点浅见。
[Abstract]:How to understand quotient is a problem worth studying. There are different understandings of Shang at all times and at home and abroad. In ancient China, the book of Han Dynasty thought that "the merchants of goods sold in the public goods", the "Shang" thought that "the Shang is far and near, the degree of its existence is not, it is called the quotient", and the Book of Books thought that "Maohe has changed his residence into a dwelling" as a business. Abroad, Scholar Webster believes that business is the exchange of goods or goods, while Blak believes that trade is the exchange of goods, products, or any kind of property. The quotient in economics is different from the quotient in law, and there are also differences in the laws of different countries. This article only discusses the understanding of "business" under the condition of socialist market economy.
，

本文编号：1915096