德、美两国宪法私法效力之比较

发布时间：2018-01-26 22:32

本文关键词： 私法宪法化客观价值秩序国家行为理论宪法的水平效力宪法的第三人效力　出处：《求是学刊》2013年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：宪法只约束公民与国家之间的公法关系,不干涉公民与公民之间的私法关系,是西方法律的一个深远的历史传统。但二十世纪后期,随着社会和法律的发展,在西方社会的司法实践中又产生了一个有悖上述传统的相同趋势,即宪法权利规范对公民与公民之间的私人关系或私法关系的渗透和影响。德国与美国是产生这一趋势的两个典型国家,分别生成了使这种趋势正当化的两个典型理论,即"价值辐射"理论和"国家行为"理论。由这两个不同理论所指导的司法实践能够产生不同的法律后果。
[Abstract]:The constitution only binds the public law relations between citizens and the state, and does not interfere in the private law relations between citizens and citizens, which is a profound historical tradition of western law. However, in the late period of 20th century, with the development of society and law. In the judicial practice of the western society, the same trend has emerged which is contrary to the above tradition. Germany and the United States are the two typical countries that produce this trend, that is, the penetration and influence of constitutional right norms on the private relations or private law relations between citizens and citizens. Two typical theories, namely "value radiation" theory and "behavior of state" theory, have been generated to justify this trend. The judicial practice guided by these two different theories can produce different legal consequences.
【作者单位】：黑龙江大学法学院;
【基金】：黑龙江省教育厅人文社科基地重点项目“法治社会中的民事权利的宪法保护”,项目编号:11522Z014
【分类号】：DD911;D971.2;D951.6
【正文快照】： 公法与私法,即宪法与民法的两域分治是西方社会的一个影响深远的历史传统。但至二十世纪后半叶,在西方社会的司法实践中却逐渐出现了一个有悖上述传统的相同趋势,即宪法权利规范对私法关系或私人关系的影响和适用,即作为公法的宪法以不同方式、在不同程度上具有了私法效力,也

【共引文献】