财产权宪法化与近代中国社会本位立法

发布时间：2018-06-23 23:31

本文选题：宪法财产权 + 社会性权利　；参考：《中国社会科学》2016年06期

【摘要】：财产权保障是私法的核心内容之一,"私有财产神圣不可侵犯"也被写入近代宪法。但随着20世纪以来法律社会化的潮流,私权不再"绝对"而受到公法的规制,财产权社会属性也为现代宪法所确认,其标志是1919年德国魏玛宪法的颁布。传统的民生思想与现代的社会本位理念相结合,使得近代中国宪法财产权的规定在内容及体系安排上,与其他宪法基本权利条款相较有所不同。在近代中国移植西方法律的过程中,保护财产权的民法典与限制财产权的社会本位立法同时引入中国。当代不少人拘泥于所谓宪法财产权的"形式主义陷阱",将宪法财产权条款与市场经济、法治联系在一起,片面强调没有宪法的保障就没有财产安全也就没有自由、繁荣的市场。这是对财产权历史与现实的双重误解。
[Abstract]:The protection of property rights is one of the core contents of private law, and private property is also written into the modern constitution. However, with the trend of the socialization of law since the 20th century, private rights are no longer "absolute" and subject to the regulation of public law. The social attribute of property rights is also confirmed by the modern constitution, which is marked by the promulgation of the Weimar Constitution of Germany in 1919. The combination of the traditional thought of people's livelihood and the modern concept of social standard makes the provisions of the property right of the constitution of modern China different from other articles of the basic rights of the constitution in terms of content and system arrangement. In the process of transplanting western law in modern China, the civil code of property right protection and the social standard legislation of restricting property right were introduced into China simultaneously. Many people are stuck to the "formalism trap" of the so-called constitutional property rights, linking the terms of the constitutional property rights with the market economy and the rule of law, and unilaterally emphasizing that without the protection of the Constitution, there would be no property security and no free and prosperous market. This is a double misunderstanding of the history and reality of property rights.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【基金】：国家“万人计划”青年拔尖人才计划的支持
【分类号】：D921

【相似文献】