质量技术监督行政处罚自由裁量权的滥用及其控制

发布时间：2017-12-31 17:39

本文关键词：质量技术监督行政处罚自由裁量权的滥用及其控制　出处：《宁波大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在质量技术监督执法活动中,行政处罚自由裁量权的运用是常态,但由于现有的管理体制、法律规范以及控制机制的不健全,导致其运行中存在一些问题。文章主要内容将围绕质量技术监督领域行政处罚自由裁量权的一般理论、滥用的表现形式与危害、滥用的原因以及控制对策展开研究。文章第一部分以绪论的形式分别概括了选题的背景及研究意义,在参考国内外研究现状的基础上提出了自己的研究方法和思路,并提出自己关于质量技术监督行政处罚自由裁量权滥用的遏制方法。第二部分结合行政自由裁量权的一般理论界定了质量技术监督行政处罚自由裁量权的基本涵义和发展趋势,并在质量技术监督执法实践活动中概括该权力的运用特点及控制方向。第三部分以因果分析法,从形式与后果的角度分析质量技术监督行政处罚自由裁量权滥用的整体状态。该部分结合行政法学科知识、法律法规、执法实践等对质量技术监督行政执法中出现的超越权限执法、滥用执法权以及放弃或拖延履行职责对行政相对人、行政主体和社会造成的危害进行深入分析。第四部分分析造成质量技术监督行政处罚自由裁量权滥用的原因。首先,从质量技术监督执法主体历史沿革及其遗留问题与执法实践中参差不齐的水平分析执法主体方面的原因。其次,在质量技术监督行政处罚自由裁量制度建设上,就法律制度不完善以及缺乏合理的行政处罚裁量基准展开论述。最后,以过程监督的分析视角总结出在质量技术监督行政处罚自由裁量权控制上存在事前监督缺位、事中监督乏力、事后监督不及时的问题。第五部分是细化质量技术监督行政处罚自由裁量权滥用的控制对策。是全文的重点内容。该部分从人、制度与机制三方面对质量技术监督行政处罚自由裁量制度完善进行了立体化构建。
[Abstract]:The quality and technical supervision and law enforcement activities, the use of administrative penalty discretion is the norm, but because of the existing management system, law and control mechanism is not perfect, leading to the existence of some problems in the operation. The main content of the article will focus on the general theory of the field of quality and technical supervision of administrative penalty discretion, form and the harm of abuse, abuse of reason and control countermeasure. This paper form the first part of the introduction respectively summarizes the background and significance of the topics on the basis of the research status at home and abroad for reference on the proposed methods and ideas of their own research, and puts forward a method to curb the quality and technical supervision of administrative penalty discretion the abuse of the right. The basic meaning and the development of the general theory of the second part of the combination of administrative discretion to define the quality and technical supervision of administrative penalty discretion The trend, and in the quality and technical supervision and control the direction of the general characteristics of using power law enforcement practice. In the third part, causal analysis, overall condition from the form and the consequences of the analysis of quality and technical supervision of the administrative penalty discretion abuse. This part combines science knowledge, administrative law laws and regulations, law enforcement practice and so on the law enforcement beyond the authority of quality and technical supervision in the administrative law enforcement, law enforcement and abuse of right to give up or delay to perform the duties of the administrative relative person harm, administrative body and society caused by in-depth analysis. The fourth part analysis the reasons of quality and technical supervision of the administrative penalty discretion abuse. First of all, from the quality and technical supervision uneven enforcement body the history and legacy and the practice of law enforcement level of law enforcement main reason analysis. Secondly, the quality and technical supervision of the administrative penalty The construction of judicial discretion, the legal system is not perfect and lack of administrative penalty discretion benchmark reasonable is discussed. Finally, the analysis from the perspective of process supervision summed up in the quality and technical supervision of the administrative penalty discretion control are lack of supervision in advance, supervision is weak, supervision timely. The fifth part is the detailed control measures of quality and technical supervision of administrative penalty discretion abuse. Is the key content of the thesis. In this part, three aspects of the system and mechanism of quality and technical supervision of the administrative penalty discretion system of three-dimensional construction.

【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.11

【参考文献】