安全生产事故赔偿请求竞合问题的研究

发布时间：2018-02-21 03:25

本文关键词： 安全生产事故请求竞合人身损害赔偿工伤保险赔偿　出处：《北京交通大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国当下的安全生产形势仍旧异常严峻,对于事故中受难者的救济问题也不容忽视。就我国现有的法律规定与社会救济制度来说,事故受难者往往同时享有人损与工伤两种不同的赔偿请求。很多学者倾向于是请求权上的竞合,对于这样的看法,本文并不认同。而在两种赔偿请求发生竞合时的处理问题上,当下学界也有很多不同的看法,立法与司法上也没能有一个统一的答案。在安全生产事故的赔偿请求发生竞合之时,来自国家最高立法、司法等权力机关选择回避的态度,一些或模棱两可或参差次不齐的规章规定,无疑从心理上、经济上对于那些事故的弱势受害者群体造成难以弥补的二次伤害。本文首先通过典型案例的引入,从法院两审判决中引出文章的争议焦点:当安全生产事故受难者在工伤待遇与人损赔偿两种请求发生冲突时该怎样解决。为了解决这一问题,文章开始对于这些请求权在制度起源、责任类型、冲突竞合根源等角度进行比较,并对比它们各自在适用上的优势与不足。并提出现有法律在适用上的问题,为提出合理的处理模式作铺垫。接着,通过对我国当下各地方法院的司法实务现状进行研究与归纳。综合上述对于赔偿请求竞合的分析,得出结论。通过研究本文认为,人身损害赔偿与工伤保险赔偿之间不应当有适用次序上的限制,在其赔偿请求发生竞合时的处理模式上,应当采取部分补充部分兼得模式的基本原则,并且对于少数无第三人侵权且单位无过错的情况下,辅佐以适用替代模式。
[Abstract]:The current situation of safety in production in our country is still extremely severe, and the problem of relief for the victims of the accident should not be ignored. As far as the existing legal provisions and social relief systems are concerned, The victims of accidents often have two different claims for compensation at the same time. Many scholars tend to compete on the right of claim. This paper does not agree with this view. However, in the case of the two kinds of claims, when they are competing for compensation, many scholars do not agree with this view, but on the issue of how to deal with the two kinds of claims when they are competing for compensation. At present, there are many different views in academic circles, and there is no uniform answer between legislation and judicature. When the claims for compensation for accidents of production safety occur, they come from the highest legislative and judicial authorities in the country and choose to evade their attitude. There is no doubt that some of the rules and regulations, which are ambiguous or uneven, cause irreparable secondary injury to the vulnerable groups of victims of the accident, both psychologically and economically. First of all, through the introduction of typical cases, The controversial point of the article is drawn from the court's two trial decisions: how to resolve the conflict between the work-related injury treatment and the compensation for damages when the victims of the safety of production accident have two kinds of claims, in order to solve this problem, The article begins to compare these claims in terms of the origin of the system, the type of responsibility, the source of conflict, and so on, and compares their respective advantages and disadvantages in the application of the law, and puts forward the problems of the application of the existing law. In order to put forward a reasonable treatment model. Then, through the research and induction of the current judicial practice of the local courts in China, synthesizing the above analysis for the competing claims, draw a conclusion. Through the study of this paper, There should be no restrictions on the order of application between the compensation for personal injury and the compensation for industrial injury insurance. And for a few cases where no third party infringes and the unit is not at fault, the alternative mode is applied.
【学位授予单位】：北京交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D920.5;D922.54

【相似文献】