论我国社会保险争议处理路径的完善

发布时间：2018-03-15 21:21

本文选题：社会保险权　切入点：社会保险争议　出处：《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国现有的社会保险争议处理路径十分混乱。完善和改革我国社会保险争议处理路径的基础在于须对社会保险争议的属性进行重新认识及定位。本文在对过往的文献资料、现有的立法现状和改革成果进行梳理、总结的基础上,结合现实中容易引起混淆的问题点,加以具体阐述和论证。第一部分,试图厘清我国社会保险争议的概念,把社会保险争议界定为劳动者与用人单位、劳动者与社会保险经办机构之间发生的社会保险争议以及因第三人侵权导致侵权损害赔偿和社会保险给付并行给付的争议。再对社会保险权的权利属性进行辨析。社会保险权核心在于社会保险待遇给付请求权。笔者又对社会保险法律关系、社会保险争议的"社会属性"、"公法保险属性"、"法定属性"进行厘清,笔者认为社会保险争议属于公私兼顾,以公为主,不应以私法救济代替公法救济,而应该构建公法救济为主,私法救济为辅的"二元救济路径",强调国家责任的主导性。第二部分,对我国社会保险争议处理路径的构建的原因进行分析,并介绍当前我国我国社会保险争议处理路径的立法现状和存在的问题,例如劳动者社会保险权益规范不力、社会保险争议处理机构主管范围不明晰、行政执法与仲裁、诉讼救济的分割化、未建立专门的社会保险争议处理机构与程序等。第三部分,通过介绍和借鉴域外社会保险争议处理路径的立法例,指明我国应实行公法救济前置主义,正确处理行政权与司法权的关系以及设置专门的社会保险争议处理机构和程序,设立违宪审查制度等。第四部分,提出完善和改革我国社会保险争议处理路径的方案构想,我国社会保险争议处理路径当下的完善方案为:明确对劳动者社会保险权益的规定、社会保险相关行政部门建立协作机制、界定社会保险争议处理机构的主管范围、社会保险争议处理程序的衔接和完善;长远的改革方案为:确立我国社会保险权利救济程序立法的全新理念、制定处理社会保险争议配套的程序法律、设立处理社会保险争议的专门处理机构、设立宪法法院。
[Abstract]:The existing path of social insurance dispute settlement in China is very chaotic. The foundation of perfecting and reforming the path of social insurance dispute settlement in China lies in the need to re-understand and position the attributes of social insurance dispute. On the basis of summing up the existing legislative status and reform achievements, and combining with the confusing problems in reality, it is expounded and demonstrated concretely. The first part tries to clarify the concept of social insurance dispute in China. Defining social insurance disputes as workers and employers, The social insurance dispute between the laborer and the social insurance agency and the dispute between the tort damage compensation and the social insurance payment caused by the third party tort. The analysis of the right attribute of the social insurance right. The core of the right to social insurance lies in the right to claim payment of social insurance benefits. The "social attribute", "public law insurance attribute" and "legal attribute" of the social insurance dispute are clarified. The author thinks that the social insurance dispute belongs to the public and the public, and should not replace the public law relief with the private law remedy. In the second part, the author analyzes the reasons for the construction of the path of social insurance dispute settlement in China, which should be based on public law relief and supplemented by private law relief, emphasizing the leading role of national responsibility. It also introduces the current legislative situation and existing problems of China's social insurance dispute settlement path, such as the weak regulation of workers' social insurance rights and interests, the unclear scope of competence of social insurance dispute processing institutions, administrative law enforcement and arbitration, etc. The third part, through introducing and drawing lessons from the legislation examples of the settlement path of the social insurance dispute, points out that our country should carry out the preposition of public law relief. Dealing with the relationship between administrative power and judicial power correctly, setting up special social insurance dispute handling institutions and procedures, setting up unconstitutional review system, etc., etc., puts forward a plan to perfect and reform the path of social insurance dispute settlement in our country. The current perfect scheme of the path of social insurance dispute settlement in China is as follows: defining the regulations on the social insurance rights and interests of workers, establishing a cooperative mechanism of social insurance related administrative departments, and defining the scope of competence of the social insurance dispute settlement organization. The long-term reform plan is: to establish a new concept of legislation of social insurance right relief procedure, to formulate procedural laws to deal with social insurance disputes, To set up a special body to deal with social insurance disputes and to establish a Constitutional Court.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.182.3

【参考文献】