跨省联席会议制度运行的法制困境与出路
本文选题:跨省联席会议 切入点:公务法人 出处:《吉首大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:跨省联席会议是我国当前省际区域间合作的重要组织形式,已经被长三角、泛珠三角等区域所实践,成为区域发展中解决区域壁垒的常态组织形式。然而,跨省联席会议的践行还没有形成制度化,从法律性质的界定到议事规则的制定,再到决议的执行更多的只是一种行政合作形式,停留在跨区域政府间自愿合作的协同上,而并没有上升到法制层面。特别是对跨省联席会议的主体性质缺乏法律定性与法理分析,导致该制度存在权义结构不清晰、议事规则不健全、法律责任机制缺乏等问题。跨省联席会议的实质是区域内行政事务的管理、协调组织机构,其职能是协调区域合作、管理区域公共事务,为区域提供公共服务和公用事业,因此可以参照域外相对成熟的“公务法人”理论,将跨省联席会议定性为一种“公务法人”性质的行政主体,并围绕该主体性质来构建它相应的权义结构、议事规则与责任机制等,从而使跨省联席会议制度化、系统性。跨省联席会议的权义结构包含了跨省际合作政府之间的内部权义结构以及跨省联席会议作为公务法人与相对人之间的外部权义结构。明确好内外的权义结构,则需要在形成的行政合作协议中细化会议议事规则,例如建构更为规范的议事程序、统一议事成果形式、建立内外结合的监督机制等。作为一种公务法人,跨省联席会议应建立相应的对内、对外法律责任机制,即对内赋予会议决议强制力的法律效力,并构建违约责任机制和行政解决机制,对违反决议、协议的参与方给予相应的处罚,确保协议的执行;对外建立对行政相对人的法律责任机制,保障区域内行政相对人的合法权益。总之,以“公务法人”理论为切入点,对我国跨省联席会议进行系统的制度构建,使之制度化并更具范式,然后更好地运用于跨区域合作。
[Abstract]:The inter-provincial joint meeting is an important organization form of inter-provincial cooperation in our country. It has been practiced in the Yangtze River Delta, the Pan Pearl River Delta and so on, and has become the normal organization form to solve the regional barriers in the regional development.However, the practice of inter-provincial joint meetings has not yet been institutionalized, from the definition of legal nature to the formulation of rules of procedure, and then to the implementation of resolutions is more than a form of administrative cooperation, staying in the inter-regional intergovernmental voluntary cooperation coordination.And did not rise to the level of the legal system.In particular, the lack of legal qualitative and legal analysis of the main nature of the inter-provincial joint meeting leads to the lack of clear structure of right and meaning, imperfect rules of procedure and lack of legal liability mechanism in this system.The essence of the inter-provincial joint meeting is the management of administrative services within the region and the coordination of the organization, whose functions are to coordinate regional cooperation, manage regional public affairs and provide public services and utilities to the region,Therefore, referring to the relatively mature theory of "official legal person" abroad, the inter-provincial joint meeting can be characterized as an administrative subject with the nature of "public legal person", and its corresponding structure of right and meaning should be constructed around the nature of the subject.Rules of procedure and responsibility mechanism, so as to institutionalize and systematize inter-provincial joint meetings.The power and justice structure of the inter-provincial joint meeting includes the internal structure of the inter-provincial cooperative government and the external structure of the inter-provincial joint meeting between the public legal person and the relative person.In order to clarify the structure of power and justice inside and outside, it is necessary to refine the rules of procedure of the conference in the administrative cooperation agreement formed, for example, to construct a more standardized procedure, to unify the form of the outcome of the proceedings, and to establish the supervision mechanism of the combination of internal and external, and so on.As a kind of public legal person, the inter-provincial joint meeting should establish the corresponding internal and external legal liability mechanism, that is, the legal effect that endows the conference resolution with the force of law, and constructs the mechanism of breach of contract liability mechanism and the administrative settlement mechanism to violate the resolution.The participants in the agreement shall impose corresponding penalties to ensure the implementation of the agreement and establish a legal liability mechanism for the administrative counterpart to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart in the region.In a word, taking the theory of "official legal person" as the breakthrough point, the paper systematically constructs the system of the inter-provincial joint meeting of our country, institutionalizes it and makes it more paradigm, and then it is better applied to cross-regional cooperation.
【学位授予单位】:吉首大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D630;D922.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王芳;;公务法人制度在我国的引入[J];沿海企业与科技;2010年10期
2 马怀德;公务法人问题研究[J];中国法学;2000年04期
3 马怀德;;公务法人问题研究[J];中国教育法制评论;2002年00期
4 刘洁,李煜;设立我国公务法人制度的构想[J];南京财经大学学报;2004年02期
5 吉龙华;论我国行政公务法人的法律定位[J];云南行政学院学报;2005年05期
6 石正义;;也谈我国高等学校公务法人地位[J];咸宁学院学报;2006年02期
7 左然;;公务法人研究[J];行政法学研究;2007年01期
8 姜广俊;;公务法人制度探讨[J];学术交流;2008年04期
9 马骁;;公务法人视角下的高校图书馆还书逾期的法律分析[J];大学图书馆学报;2011年02期
10 王亚利;高校被诉引发的思考[J];山西高等学校社会科学学报;2003年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 正宇;澳门的公务法人[N];法制日报;2001年
2 法国巴黎第二大学法学博士、西北政法大学欧洲法研究中心主任 杨蔚林;欧盟一体化进程中 法国政府采购主体的调整[N];中国政府采购报;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 王芳;公务法人制度研究[D];长春理工大学;2009年
2 王霁霞;公务法人制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2003年
3 王海波;公务法人研究[D];内蒙古大学;2008年
4 黄艳玲;跨省联席会议制度运行的法制困境与出路[D];吉首大学;2015年
5 康晨朝;经济功能区管委会法律问题研究[D];天津师范大学;2012年
6 庄少明;论高等学校的行政主体资格[D];复旦大学;2008年
7 李奕东;论我国高校学生管理的行政法定位[D];苏州大学;2013年
8 王侃;事业单位法律地位研究[D];西南政法大学;2013年
,本文编号:1726303
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1726303.html