我国烟草专卖行政处罚自由裁量权研究
发布时间:2018-04-20 16:02
本文选题:行政处罚 + 自由裁量权 ; 参考:《西北大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着中国加入世贸组织,我国的经济也得到了飞跃的发展,烟草行业在某种程度上可以说属于国计民生行业,所以我国对烟草行业实行专卖制度。在现代社会中,烟草专卖行政处罚自由裁量权的存在和发展是具有一定的必然性的,而自由裁量权作为行政权的重要组成部分之一,一直都是受到行政法学界高度重视的研究对象之一。然而,如果在行使烟草专卖行政处罚自由裁量权时有问题出现,那么就必须对其加以限制,在烟草专卖行政执法人员消极不作为的时候,可以对其进行软性的调整;如果行政执法人员不仅消极不作为而且还损害到行政相对人的利益,并威胁到依法行政,这种情形便属于滥用烟草专卖行政处罚自由裁量权的行为,仅仅依靠调整是达不到预期的目的的,因此,必须加强对烟草专卖行政处罚自由裁量权的控制。而对其进行控制就需要通过各种途径相互协调来实现,并防止其失调和失控,这即是现代行政法以及行政管理领域当中丞待解决的难点和需要创新的亮点,也是行政法学领域的重要研究对象。
[Abstract]:With China's accession to the WTO, China's economy has also been developed by leaps and bounds. The tobacco industry can be said to belong to the national economy and the people's livelihood to some extent, so our country implements the monopoly system to the tobacco industry. In modern society, the existence and development of the discretion of tobacco monopoly administrative punishment is inevitable, and discretion is one of the important components of administrative power. It has always been one of the research objects attached great importance by the field of administrative law. However, if there are problems in exercising the discretion of administrative punishment of tobacco monopoly, then it must be restricted, and when the administrative law enforcement personnel of tobacco monopoly do not act in a negative way, they can be soft adjusted. If the administrative law enforcement personnel not only act passively but also harm the interests of the administrative counterpart and threaten to administer according to law, this situation is an act of abusing the discretionary power of the tobacco monopoly administrative penalty, Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the control of the discretion of administrative penalty of tobacco monopoly. To control it, we need to coordinate with each other through various ways, and prevent its imbalance and runaway. This is the difficult point in the field of modern administrative law and administration and the bright spot that needs to be innovated. It is also an important research object in the field of administrative law.
【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.11;D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 李靖;高崴;;强化行政自由裁量权的制度性约束——基于行政问责制[J];吉首大学学报(社会科学版);2011年01期
2 许娟娟;;谈行政机关的行政自由裁量权[J];哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报;2013年03期
3 吴传毅;;行政自由裁量权的现实基础、种类及立法控制[J];四川行政学院学报;2010年04期
,本文编号:1778454
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1778454.html