网络隐私权司法保护的信息困境

发布时间：2018-05-05 17:01

本文选题：司法 + 信息　；参考：《理论月刊》2017年06期

【摘要】：大数据时代个人隐私权受到了空前的威胁,针对隐私权司法保护的呼声不断高涨。作为第三方治理机制的司法,在大数据背景之下,遭遇了信息的困境。个人隐私保护受到来自大数据的信息壁垒以及司法资源有限的约束,司法机关难以合理的成本对专业型信息进行解码,大量不具备可观察性与可验证性的信息阻碍了司法程序的推进。从信息经济学角度切入,在公共惩罚缺乏信息优势的背景下,通过声誉机制以低成本的私人惩罚方式拯救个人隐私侵权的危局。通过建立网络信用档案,通过文牍主义构造权力书写,形成对网络管理者的威慑与激励的双重效应。运用经济学的原则,设置基于信息与行为的连带责任,并结合汉德公式的启示,对过错责任进行科学有效的认定。
[Abstract]:Big data era of personal privacy has been unprecedented threats, the right to judicial protection of privacy voice is rising. As a third-party governance mechanism of the judiciary, under the background of big data, encountered the plight of information. Personal privacy protection is constrained by information barriers from big data and limited judicial resources, and it is difficult for the judiciary to decode professional information at reasonable cost. A large amount of unobservable and verifiable information hinders the advancement of the judicial process. From the point of view of information economics, under the background of the lack of information advantage in public punishment, the reputation mechanism can save the personal privacy infringement by low-cost private punishment. Through the establishment of network credit files and the construction of power writing through the doctrine of writing, the dual effect of deterrence and incentive to network managers is formed. By applying the principles of economics, this paper sets up joint liability based on information and behavior, and combines the inspiration of Hande formula to identify the fault liability scientifically and effectively.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;河北地质大学法政学院;
【基金】：河北省社会科学研究基金项目(HB14FX009)
【分类号】：D912.1;D913

【相似文献】