论社会保险法的私人实施——以反垄断法的私人执行为参照

发布时间：2018-05-08 20:42

本文选题：社会保险法 + 私人实施　；参考：《甘肃政法学院学报》2017年06期

【摘要】：结合我国社会保险法公共执行不力的局面将长期存在的现实国情,以反垄断法的私人执行制度为参照,得出:社会保险法的私人实施机制在专门化的社会保险争议解决机制建立前的过渡期内有继续存在的必要,法律未修改前不能仅凭"答记者问"就堵塞私人执行通道,此类问题应由最高法院提请人大常委会通过修法或做出法律解释解决。私人实施机制可以从以下几方面进行完善:劳动者与用人单位之间不宜补办补缴类社会保险损失赔偿争议应通过私人直接实施模式解决;宜补办补缴类社会保险损失赔偿争议应通过"审决前置"模式解决,还可通过完善行政附带民事诉讼制度解决;完善社会保险争议民事诉讼的具体规则;对于用人单位与劳动者之间的纯缴费争议,必须在完善公共执行机制的前提下再着手堵塞其私人实施通道。
[Abstract]:In combination with the situation that the public enforcement of the social insurance law in China is weak, it will be a long-term reality, and the private enforcement system of the anti-monopoly law will be taken as a reference. It is concluded that the private implementation mechanism of the social insurance law will continue to exist during the transitional period before the establishment of the specialized social insurance dispute resolution mechanism. Before the law is amended, the private execution channel cannot be blocked just by "answering reporters' questions." Such issues should be referred by the Supreme Court to the standing Committee of the National people's Congress for amendment or interpretation. The private implementation mechanism can be perfected from the following aspects: it is not appropriate for the laborer and the employing unit to make up the compensation dispute of the social insurance loss of the kind of repaying should be solved through the private direct implementation mode; The compensation dispute of social insurance loss should be settled by the mode of "trial leading", the system of administrative incidental civil action should be improved, the specific rules of civil action of social insurance dispute should be perfected, and the compensation dispute of social insurance should be settled by means of the mode of "trial decision" and the system of administrative incidental civil action. For the pure payment dispute between the employer and the laborer, the private implementation channel must be blocked on the premise of perfecting the public execution mechanism.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;甘肃政法学院;
【基金】：2014年国家社科基金重点项目《劳动关系认定实证研究》(项目编号:14AFX021) 2017年甘肃政法学院科研重大项目《社会保险争议专门化处理法律机制研究》之阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.182.3

【相似文献】