当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

行政决策中政府法律风险防控机制构建

发布时间:2018-05-22 10:31

  本文选题:行政决策 + 法律风险 ; 参考:《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:行政主体处理日常的政府事物的过程中依照特定的决策程序所做出的特定决策行为,通过特定的决策程序达到实现设定的目标,此为行政决策的基本认知。在以往的理论研究中行政决策被行政学和行政管理学等学科所关注并已经成为一套成熟的理论,然而,行政法学并没有将其乃入其中。当我们翻阅当下的行政法学教科书时会发现没有一本教材有关于行政决策的阐述。时至今日,在法治中国建设的背景下,行政决策的法治化问题正日益受到人们的关注。因此,行政决策的法律风险防控机制的构建也显得尤为重要。力图从源头上避免行政决策给社会带来不必要的损失,更为重要的是造成政府公信力的下降。笔者从行政决策中政府风险概述、政府风险的界定及类型、研究行政决策中政府风险的意义、行政决策中的政府风险及原因分析、域外行政决策中政府风险法律防控机制的借鉴、我国行政决策中的政府风险法律防控机制的构建展开论述。 文章的主干内容可以分为四个部分: 第一部分,主要介绍行政决策中政府风险的概述。首先从公共管理学的视野下介绍行政决策的内涵和外延,对行政决策的内容有基本的把握。其次,在行政法学的视野下探讨行政决策的概念。同时将法律风险的内容引入其中。 第二部分,主要介绍行政决策中政府风险的内容以及风险的原因,主要包括理论滞后、立法缺位、行政决策机制和机构的不健全、行政决策的监督机制和事后追责程序乏力、信息公开不到位等。 第三部分,主要介绍域外国家和地区行政决策风险的经验。笔者通过对台湾、意大利、德国等几个国家和地区中有关行政决策的介绍,希望对我国行政决策的法治化建设具有借鉴和启迪作用。 第四部分,主要介绍对行政决策中法律风险防控机制构建。其中包括:行政决策的启动和决策内容、行政决策公众参与、专家咨询委员会的建立、行政决策信息公开、行政决策的救济制度等内容。
[Abstract]:In the process of dealing with the daily government affairs, the administrative subject makes the specific decision behavior according to the specific decision-making procedure, and achieves the set goal through the specific decision procedure, which is the basic cognition of the administrative decision. In the previous theoretical research, administrative decision-making has been concerned by administrative science and administrative management and has become a set of mature theory, however, administrative law has not included it. When we look through the current textbooks of administrative law, we find that none of them has an explanation of administrative decision. Today, people pay more and more attention to the rule of law in administrative decision-making under the background of the rule of law in China. Therefore, the construction of legal risk prevention and control mechanism in administrative decision-making is particularly important. It tries hard to avoid the unnecessary loss to the society from the administrative decision and, more importantly, to reduce the credibility of the government. The author studies the meaning of government risk in administrative decision, the government risk in administrative decision and the reasons for it, from the perspective of government risk, the definition and type of government risk, the meaning of government risk in administrative decision making, and the analysis of government risk in administrative decision making. This paper discusses the construction of the legal prevention and control mechanism of government risk in the administrative decision-making of our country for reference of the legal prevention and control mechanism of government risk in overseas administrative decision-making. The backbone of the article can be divided into four parts: The first part mainly introduces the summary of government risk in administrative decision-making. Firstly, it introduces the connotation and extension of administrative decision from the perspective of public management, and has a basic grasp of the content of administrative decision. Secondly, the concept of administrative decision-making is discussed from the perspective of administrative jurisprudence. At the same time, the content of legal risk is introduced into it. The second part mainly introduces the contents and causes of government risk in administrative decision making, including the lag of theory, the absence of legislation, the unsoundness of administrative decision-making mechanism and organization, the weakness of supervision mechanism and after-responsibility procedure of administrative decision making. Information disclosure is not in place and so on. The third part mainly introduces the experience of foreign countries and regions administrative decision-making risk. Through the introduction of relevant administrative decisions in Taiwan, Italy, Germany and other countries and regions, the author hopes to provide reference and inspiration for the construction of the rule of law in administrative decision-making in China. The fourth part mainly introduces the construction of legal risk prevention and control mechanism in administrative decision-making. It includes: the starting and decision-making content of administrative decision, the public participation in administrative decision making, the establishment of expert advisory committee, the publicity of administrative decision information, the relief system of administrative decision making and so on.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 刘烨华;沈睿泽;;从欧美国家行政决策制度的特点看我国行政决策制度的改革[J];长春市委党校学报;2008年06期

2 朱海波;;地方政府重大行政决策程序立法及其完善[J];广东社会科学;2013年04期

3 宋世明,王思武;当代西方公共行政决策体制及其借鉴价值[J];国家行政学院学报;2001年05期

4 应松年;;《湖南省行政程序规定》制定和实施情况的调查报告[J];国家行政学院学报;2009年05期

5 马宝成;;中国地方政府决策模式探析——以HT县为例[J];国家行政学院学报;2009年06期

6 刘燕;;当代西方公共行政决策及启示[J];山东财政学院学报;2009年03期

7 王万华;;统一行政程序立法的破冰之举——解读《湖南省行政程序规定》[J];行政法学研究;2008年03期

8 王锡锌;;行政决策正当性要素的个案解读——以北京市机动车“尾号限行”政策为个案的分析[J];行政法学研究;2009年01期



本文编号:1921703

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1921703.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4bbe3***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com