论我国高校自主招生程序的法律规制
发布时间:2018-06-20 20:06
本文选题:自主招生 + 法律程序 ; 参考:《南京师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:实行三十多年的高考制度为我国培养了众多的实用人才,但是其一考定终身的考试模式也饱受诟病。为了改变这种单一的考试模式和现行的高校教育体制,从2001年起我国部分高校开始实行自主招生考试制度,高校可以根据本校的特色与高校自身对人才要求,公平公正地自主招录一部分人才,促进大学特色化与多元化的发展。自主招生在一定程度上给予了高校更大的办学自主权,完善丰富了高考入学制度。在自主招生考试开展的十多年来,自主招生考试迅速发展,吸引越来越多的考生参加到自主招生过程中来,越来越多的考生的通过自主招生考试进入了大学,改变了自身的命运。 矛盾是普遍存在的,自主招生考试制度在我国迅速的发展同时,自主招生考试也出现了种种问题,引起了越来越多社会人士与考生家长开始质疑自主招生考试的公平性,如自主招生程序中缺乏对自主招生权的监督、考生权利保护不足、考生维权难、考试信息不透明等问题。这些出题的出现可能会引发暗箱操作,导致滋生腐败。在一定程度上都严重的损害了自主招生考试制度的公平性、考生的利益与自主招生的健康发展。 自主招生过程中出现的种种问题也开始让我们反思其出现原因。通过对自主招生过程中出现的这些问题分析,我们发现出现问题的根本原因还是由自主招生程序不完善引起的。我国高校在自主招生过程中过于注重自主招生制度本身,忽略了自主招生程序的作用。由于自主招生程序的缺失,容易造成自主招生权的失范。为此,为了保证自主招生考试制度的公平与公正、约束与监督自主招生权的行使与考生利益的保护,文章从自主招生程序的法律体系的构建与完善、监督机制与权利救济完善方面来构建我国高校自主招生的法律程序。
[Abstract]:The college entrance examination system for more than 30 years has trained many practical talents for our country, but its life-long examination mode has also been criticized. In order to change this single examination mode and the current university education system, since 2001, some colleges and universities in our country began to implement the independent enrollment examination system, which can be based on the characteristics of the university and the requirements of the university itself for talents. Fair and independent recruitment of a part of talent, to promote the characteristics of universities and the development of diversity. To a certain extent, autonomous enrollment gives universities greater autonomy in running a school and enriches the entrance system of the college entrance examination. In the more than ten years since the independent enrollment examination was carried out, the independent enrollment test has developed rapidly, attracting more and more candidates to participate in the independent enrollment process, and more candidates have entered the university through the independent enrollment examination. Changed his own destiny. The contradiction is universal. At the same time, with the rapid development of the independent enrollment examination system in our country, there are also various problems in the autonomous enrollment examination, which has caused more and more social personages and parents to question the fairness of the autonomous enrollment examination. For example, the independent enrollment procedure lacks the supervision to the independent enrollment right, the examinee right protection is insufficient, the examinee rights protection is difficult, the examination information is not transparent and so on. The emergence of these problems may lead to dark box operations, leading to corruption. To a certain extent, it seriously damages the fairness of independent enrollment examination system, the interests of candidates and the healthy development of independent enrollment. The problems that appear in the process of independent enrollment also start to let us reflect on the reasons for their emergence. Through the analysis of these problems in the process of independent enrollment, we find that the root cause of the problems is still caused by the imperfect process of independent enrollment. In the process of independent enrollment, colleges and universities pay too much attention to the system itself and neglect the function of independent enrollment procedure. Due to the lack of independent enrollment procedures, it is easy to cause the loss of the right of independent enrollment. Therefore, in order to ensure the fairness and justice of the independent enrollment examination system, to restrain and supervise the exercise of the independent enrollment right and the protection of the examinee's interests, the article constructs and consummates the legal system of the independent enrollment procedure. In the aspect of supervision mechanism and the perfection of right relief, the legal procedure of independent enrollment of colleges and universities in our country is constructed.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.16
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张文军;英国14-19岁普通教育考试制度与高校入学机制的关系研究[J];比较教育研究;2004年07期
2 张亚群;;高校自主招生改革:动因、问题与对策[J];北京大学教育评论;2010年02期
3 吴向明;;美国高等学校招生制度的特点及启示[J];大学(研究与评价);2007年Z1期
4 张千帆;;大学招生考试多元化的宪法底线——兼论高考分省自主命题与大学自主招生制度的违宪性[J];法商研究;2010年05期
5 熊丙奇;;促进受教育权平等须推进真正意义的自主招生[J];法学;2009年11期
6 尹晓敏;高校学生管理引入听证制度的法律思考[J];高等工程教育研究;2005年04期
7 王立科;;英国高校自主招生的实践及其启示[J];高等工程教育研究;2009年01期
8 张静;论高校对学生的管理权与学生受教育权的冲突与平衡[J];河北法学;2003年02期
9 程斯辉;自主招生与高校的自觉、自律和创新[J];湖北招生考试;2004年12期
10 孙中涛;;浅析当前高校自主招生政策及其试点[J];现代教育科学;2006年07期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 樊本富;中国高校自主招生研究[D];厦门大学;2009年
,本文编号:2045514
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2045514.html