当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

我国城乡规划利害关系人程序性权利保障研究

发布时间:2018-07-05 17:41

  本文选题:城乡规划 + 利害关系人 ; 参考:《黑龙江大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:我国城乡规划立法和理论研究比较落后,存在着城乡规划利害关系人的合法权益缺乏法律的保障,致使近年来其权益屡受侵害的现象时有发生。总体上看,目前,我国在城乡规划利害关系人程序性权利保障方面存在的问题有:利害关系人程序性权利缺位,,利害关系人程序性权利缺乏可操作性,利害关系人程序性权利缺乏完善的救济机制。出现这些问题的主要原因在于城乡规划理论研究滞后、城乡规划法律对城乡规划利害关系人的程序性权利保障不完善、城乡规划利害关系人程序性权利缺乏统一行政程序法的保障、城乡居民薄弱的公众参与意识。而完善城乡规划利害关系人程序性权利保障机制,应从立法层面着重解决三个问题:一是修订《城乡规划法》,细化其中的信息公开制度和听证制度;二是尽快制定《行政程序法》,为行政主体设定统一的程序规则;三是完善程序性权利救济机制,具体可通过扩大行政复议和行政诉讼的受案范围来实现。
[Abstract]:The legislative and theoretical research of urban and rural planning in China is relatively backward, there is a lack of legal protection of the legal rights and interests of urban and rural planning stakeholders, resulting in their rights and interests repeatedly violated in recent years. Generally speaking, at present, the problems existing in the protection of the procedural rights of the stakeholders in urban and rural planning in China include the absence of procedural rights of the interested parties, the lack of operability of procedural rights of the interested parties, The procedural rights of the interested parties lack a perfect relief mechanism. The main reasons for these problems are that the theoretical research on urban and rural planning is lagging behind, and the procedural rights of the stakeholders in urban and rural planning are not well protected by the law of urban and rural planning. The procedural rights of the stakeholders in urban and rural planning lack the guarantee of unified administrative procedure law and the weak public participation consciousness of urban and rural residents. To perfect the procedural rights guarantee mechanism of the stakeholders in urban and rural planning, we should focus on solving three problems from the legislative level: first, revise the Urban-Rural Planning Law to refine the information publicity system and the hearing system; The second is to formulate the Administrative procedure Law as soon as possible to set up unified procedural rules for the administrative subject, and the third is to perfect the relief mechanism of procedural rights, which can be realized by expanding the scope of administrative reconsideration and the acceptance of cases in administrative proceedings.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.1;D922.297;D925.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 付康康;;城镇化过程中行政规划的法律规制[J];长春工程学院学报(社会科学版);2011年04期

2 赵凯;张尤佳;;城乡规划利害关系人的权利救济[J];法制与社会;2009年34期

3 邢艳芬;;浅议城乡规划利害关系人权利保护制度[J];法制与社会;2011年04期

4 章剑生;;行政规划初论[J];法治研究;2007年07期

5 郑文武;;论城乡规划利害关系人界定的理论标准和实践方法[J];规划师;2010年04期

6 莫于川;郭庆珠;;我国行政法学界关于行政规划的理论研究现状分析[J];南都学坛;2007年01期

7 郭庆珠;;论行政规划利害关系人的权利保障和法律救济——兼从公益与私益博弈的视角分析行政规划的法律规制[J];法学论坛;2006年03期

8 李川,王景山;论法律因果关系[J];山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年04期

9 李晨清;行政诉讼原告资格的利害关系要件分析[J];行政法学研究;2004年01期

10 徐元;;城乡规划的法律性质分析[J];中国建设信息;2008年04期



本文编号:2101123

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2101123.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4c2aa***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com