论农村土地属于集体所有的宪法解释

发布时间：2018-10-29 10:54

【摘要】：法学界对我国宪法上农村土地属于集体所有条款的规范属性、规范内涵等问题的理解存在诸多认识误区,亟待加以澄清和辩明。我国宪法上关于农村土地集体所有的条文是强制性规范而非任意性规范,省略的规范语词是"应当"而非"可以"。土地集体所有和国家所有系平等的法律关系,解释为整体和部分的政治关系因违背宪法解释的逻辑而不能成立。集体土地所有权符合基本权利的构成要件,具有时代性和强制性特征,属于政策性基本权利。集体土地所有权的主体具有双重性,农民通过成员权实现作为土地所有者权益。农村土地集体所有的解释结论的巨大差异反映了对转型宪法解释在方法论方面的大异其趣,中庸主义宪法解释方法论是解释转型宪法应遵循的基本准则。
[Abstract]:There are many misunderstandings in the understanding of the normative attribute and the connotation of the collective ownership of rural land in the constitution of our country, which need to be clarified and identified urgently. The provisions on collective ownership of rural land in China's constitution are mandatory norms rather than arbitrary norms, and the omitted normative words are "should" rather than "can". The equal legal relationship between collective ownership of land and state ownership is interpreted as a whole and part of the political relationship which cannot be established because it runs counter to the logic of constitutional interpretation. Collective land ownership accords with the constitutive elements of basic rights, and has the characteristics of times and compulsion, and belongs to the basic rights of policy. The main body of collective land ownership has dual nature, and farmers realize the rights and interests of land owners through membership rights. The great differences in the interpretation conclusions of collective ownership of rural land reflect the great differences in methodology of the interpretation of the transitional constitution. The methodology of the constitutional interpretation of the doctrine of moderation is the basic criterion to be followed in the interpretation of the transitional constitution.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“社团自治的行政法问题研究”(项目编号:11BFX100)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D921;D922.32

【相似文献】