我国行政指导适用中的困境与对策
[Abstract]:In the first Administrative procedure Law of Hunan Province issued by Hunan Provincial Government in 2008, the administrative guidance was stipulated as an independent legal procedure in the statute law. In the following years, the governments and departments of provinces, counties and autonomous regions at all levels have introduced administrative procedure regulations one after another, and have defined the administrative guidance in these procedural laws, standardizing the formulation and implementation of administrative guidance. However, in the practice of administrative guidance, there is a lack of effective measures to deal with unexpected situations in the formulation link, a lack of guiding ability to the injured interest party in the execution link, and a lack of autonomous guidance to the implementation object in the process of risk prevention. The service system of its external environmental links is not perfect, and other problems such as the awareness of rule of law need to be improved in these four links. This paper hopes to study the difficulties encountered in the process of application of administrative guidance, and apply the traditional measures to solve the problem. By referring to the administrative procedures and regulations issued by various localities and other administrative laws and regulations, and combining the measures of risk prevention and control formed in the practice of enterprises, the emergency plan system is introduced on the basis of the current legal procedures of administrative guidance. Measures such as the third-party participation system and the insurance system are used to improve the efficiency of administrative guidance in dealing with exceptional situations, and to strengthen the effectiveness of administrative guidance in the implementation process, especially with regard to major issues, Strengthen the guidance of citizens to improve their ability to resist risks, and standardize the administrative guidance through the introduction of these systems in order to perfect the procedural law.
【学位授予单位】:江西理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙萍;邓小川;;论行政指导的国家行政赔偿救济[J];学习与探索;2016年11期
2 麦麟;张兴浪;;中日行政指导制度比较研究[J];法制与经济;2016年10期
3 赵越;;行政指导类型化归责研究[J];沈阳干部学刊;2016年04期
4 王丹阳;;我国行政指导行为现存问题及规范化路径[J];实事求是;2016年04期
5 莫于川;;行政民主化与行政指导制度发展(下)——以建设服务型政府背景下的行政指导实践作为故事线索[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2013年04期
6 马凯;曹海晶;;国外行政立法控制理论及其对我国的启示[J];求索;2013年03期
7 刘家川;;新闻媒体如何正确行使监督权[J];传媒;2012年05期
8 李卫华;;论行政行为的综合意志性[J];江淮论坛;2011年06期
9 周鑫;;论行政指导的原则[J];法制与社会;2011年27期
10 林泰;陈红;;我国行政指导的制度困境与重构[J];法学杂志;2011年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 陈辉;;行政指导的五种可诉类型分析[N];人民法院报;2015年
2 黄月平;;一切权力属于人民[N];北京日报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 刘富斌;论行政指导在突发事件应对中的应用[D];清华大学;2015年
2 徐晓婷;行政指导制度实证研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
3 江宁宁;行政指导的异化问题研究[D];浙江大学;2012年
4 牟静;地方服务型政府视域下的行政指导研究[D];苏州大学;2010年
5 邓礼靖;泉州工商局行政指导管理模式构建研究[D];天津大学;2010年
6 张云;我国海关行政指导的困境及对策研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
,本文编号:2307833
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2307833.html