政府信息公开中“内部管理信息”的判定

发布时间：2018-12-23 11:42

【摘要】：内部管理信息不予公开在国务院办公厅《关于做好政府信息依申请公开工作的意见》中进行规定后,法院通过个案对如何判定内部管理信息进行了回应。通过判决梳理,可见法官在审查时关注到内部管理信息的主体、内容、程序和效力四个方面;其中"不具备外部效力"作为效力标准是法院判定内部管理信息的主要考察因素。然而针对现行规范的梳理却显示出不同的结论,信息所涉内容的"内部性"方是内部管理信息的核心,即在行政机关"履行职责"之外,属于"日常工作"中的内部管理事务;同时部门、地方性信息公开规范通过列举式规定,将人事信息、设备管理信息、内部规章制度列为内部管理信息的典型类别。以"内部性事务"作为内容标准判定内部管理信息相较于"不具备外部效力"作为效力标准而言,更符合立法原意且契合已有的规范体系。
[Abstract]:After the internal management information was not made public in the opinions of the General Office of the State Council on making the government information open according to the application, the court responded to how to judge the internal management information through individual cases. Through judgment combing, it can be seen that judges pay attention to the subject, content, procedure and effectiveness of internal management information in the examination, and "not having external effect" as the effective standard is the main investigation factor of the judgment of internal management information by the court. However, the combing of the current norms shows different conclusions. The "internality" of the contents involved in the information is the core of the internal management information, that is, in addition to "performing duties", it belongs to the internal management affairs in the "daily work". At the same time, the department, local information disclosure standard through enumeration regulation, personnel information, equipment management information, internal rules and regulations as a typical category of internal management information. Taking "internal affairs" as the content standard to judge internal management information is more in line with the original legislative intent and accord with the existing normative system, compared with "no external effect" as the validity standard.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】