行政犯法律性质的定位、缺陷及完善
发布时间：2018-12-23 12:05
【摘要】：行政犯与传统自然犯最主要的区别在于其涉及行政规制与刑法规制的交叉地带。从行政犯的构成要件与法律责任上讲,其研究的内容为行政犯罪与刑事责任,其规制的方式应当定位于刑事规制。目前,我国行政犯理论研究尚存较大的缺陷,刑法中主要以空白罪状的形式规定行政犯,对其认定需要结合相关行政法法规。这样的情况导致司法实践中认定行政犯时会出现违反罪刑法定原则的情况,而解决这样的缺陷的一个有效的手段就是将模糊的法律规定明确化。这种措施既有利于对行政犯的司法适用,也促进良好的行政规则与刑法规制之间的衔接。
[Abstract]:The main difference between administrative crime and traditional natural crime is that it involves the intersection of administrative regulation and criminal law regulation. In terms of the constitution and legal responsibility of administrative offense, the content of its research is administrative crime and criminal responsibility, and the way of its regulation should be defined as criminal regulation. At present, there are still some defects in the theoretical study of administrative offense in our country. The criminal law mainly stipulates administrative offence in the form of blank crime, and its identification needs to be combined with relevant administrative law laws and regulations. Such a situation leads to the violation of the principle of legality in judicial practice, and an effective way to solve such defects is to clarify the vague legal provisions. This kind of measure is not only beneficial to the judicial application of administrative offense, but also promotes the connection between good administrative rules and criminal law regulation.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【分类号】：D922.1
本文编号：2389959
[Abstract]:The main difference between administrative crime and traditional natural crime is that it involves the intersection of administrative regulation and criminal law regulation. In terms of the constitution and legal responsibility of administrative offense, the content of its research is administrative crime and criminal responsibility, and the way of its regulation should be defined as criminal regulation. At present, there are still some defects in the theoretical study of administrative offense in our country. The criminal law mainly stipulates administrative offence in the form of blank crime, and its identification needs to be combined with relevant administrative law laws and regulations. Such a situation leads to the violation of the principle of legality in judicial practice, and an effective way to solve such defects is to clarify the vague legal provisions. This kind of measure is not only beneficial to the judicial application of administrative offense, but also promotes the connection between good administrative rules and criminal law regulation.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【分类号】：D922.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 张绍谦;;试论行政犯中行政法规与刑事法规的关系——从著作权犯罪的“复制发行”说起[J];政治与法律;2011年08期
2 牛忠志;杜永平;;怎样实现对行政犯的“亦刑亦罚”[J];河北法学;2014年01期
3 刘军;;刑法与行政法的一体化建构——兼论行政刑法理论的解释功能[J];当代法学;2008年04期
4 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王靓|;行政刑法的罪刑研究[D];华东政法学院;2006年
，本文编号：2389959
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2389959.html
